Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time

05-21-2011 , 02:50 AM
Any chance OKC is in love with Williams would trade Harden for the #2?

Since we've waited this long I think we're keeping Rambis. Interesting bit on the Cavs saying they have a good trading piece in Sessions because he was basically their best player last season.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-21-2011 , 03:06 AM
I think we might be able to get more than Harden for the #2.

Yeah, Sessions is a decent player. Its funny how his PER was good the year before he was here and the year after he left here & it was awful the year he was here.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-21-2011 , 03:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
I think we might be able to get more than Harden for the #2.

Yeah, Sessions is a decent player. Its funny how his PER was good the year before he was here and the year after he left here & it was awful the year he was here.
Wouldn't you trade Harden for the #2 in a second? Statistcly SG was worse than PG last season for us. We fill a much bigger need, and get a player that is a little more proven and probably about the same age.

The ESPN article mentioned how Sessions was such a better fit for the Cavs as they ran a lot of pick 'n roll and he had to free lance with the Wolves.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-21-2011 , 03:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halstad
Wouldn't you trade Harden for the #2 in a second?
Of course not. With the #2 overall draft pick you hope to do better than a backup 12ppg/3rpg guy. Like, hopefully an all-star.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-21-2011 , 04:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
Of course not. With the #2 overall draft pick you hope to do better than a backup 12ppg/3rpg guy. Like, hopefully an all-star.
He is on one of the best teams in the NBA, with 2 superstars and 21 years old. I think he has much better days ahead of him.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-21-2011 , 12:14 PM
Here's some interesting stuff on the Rambis situation:

http://www.canishoopus.com/2011/5/21...ut-negotiation

Stop N Pop comments in the thread:

I have multiple and conflicting tips

My best guess is that Kahn doesn’t have the authority to fire Rambis and that Moor has put out feelers to see who would be willing to coach this squad. I have no idea if these feelers are serious or if they have netted any possible candidates. My sense is that Rambis isn’t going to budge an inch on a buyout (he shouldn’t) and that this, with the CBA uncertainty, could mean that he’s back next year. I don’t think any of the assistants have been told what the deal is yet. Taylor doesn’t want to pay multiple coaches again. I could definitely see JB being the only viable internal candidate, but I haven’t heard anything about that. 1 thing I’ve heard is that nobody wants to coach for Kahn…for reasons doing with him probably not being around more than a year and that he threw his coach under the bus before the last game of the year.

If they do get a new coach, he will be on the very, very, very cheap. Maybe a D-League guy or someone internally who wouldn’t otherwise get a shot (see JB).



As someone else commented in that thread, I'd take JB 100 times out of 100 over Rambis.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-22-2011 , 02:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halstad
He is on one of the best teams in the NBA, with 2 superstars and 21 years old. I think he has much better days ahead of him.
Still, Kevin Durant was a #2 pick. That's what we need. A savior.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-22-2011 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
Still, Kevin Durant was a #2 pick. That's what we need. A savior.
I agree. If Oden and Durant were available, I'd say under no circumstance should we trade the pick, but those type of players aren't in the draft.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-22-2011 , 11:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halstad
I agree. If Oden and Durant were available, I'd say under no circumstance should we trade the pick, but those type of players aren't in the draft.
From what I've heard there rate to be 0 superstars in this draft and maybe only a couple of allstars down the line. It seems everyone is "pretty good."

If the Wolves can package the pick with a couple other pieces for a near allstar or superstar (that would require Kevin Love though ldo) then I think they have to do it. And get a different offense. No way Ricky Rubio in the triangle makes any @#$@#$ sense.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-23-2011 , 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie24
we don't need someone with a high downside. we need someone who can be a valuable piece on a contending team along side love. (not that we will necessarily ever get there- but the goal of drafting is to try.) if derrick williams is not better than beasley he has virtually no value to us. if (as a 3) he is better than both randolph and beasley, which is not a lock, he has value about to the extent that he is better than the midway point between them. but biyombo and kanter have value to the extent that they are better than the midway point between darko and pek which is obviously way lower. guards would depend on the rubio situation and how good rubio is, but they are also potentially more valuable to us than forwards.

your whole thing about just picking the BPA because we suck is just dead wrong. we have 1 good player (plays williams' primary position) and between 2-4 potentially good players (all of whom play his secondary position). what do we need more, another potentially good player at those positions or one at the 5? it's just not true that we are starting from scratch no matter how often you repeat it.

i mean i could see your point if we were talking about kevin durant or lebron james, but we're talking about a guy who would probably be a 5th or 6th pick most years.

the only time i really think it is correct to take a worse player from a talent perspective is when you are a fringe contender, and trading for or drafting a need outweighs the overall value.

I am not happy with the prospect of getting williams because frankly he doesnt fit our team and he will not get much PT if he is here. However, I am excited about the added talent he would provide, and the added ability to trade more pieces for actual pieces we would need that he could also provide.

I am hoping kahn is able to trade out of the 2 pick, drop down and take either kanter or biyombo, but if he cannot, i think it would be a mistake to draft anyone else besides williams. i think he's the #2 player in this draft.

Also, his size isn't really an issue at the 4. he measures out at about average there.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-23-2011 , 04:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
An argument could be made that if we draft Williams, our 5 best players would be PFs.

I dont care. I want talent. I think Williams can play SF and potentially be a star. I think at worst he'd be the 3rd best player on this team. Aside from Love, none of the rest of this team matters much. I dont think Webster or Randolph matter much. Its possible they could be helpful players under a good coach, but I dont think we should worry about the small pieces.

Get Rubio here, keep Love, & either draft Williams or get a king's ransom in trade for the pick imo. Worry about how the pieces fit later.

Hopefully we can get a somewhat decent coach in here that would take advantage of our players strengths. I'm not very optimistic about that the longer they wait to fire Rambis. I get the feeling they're putting out feelers to see who they can get for cheap to replace him, and who the hell thats decent would want to come here & work for Kahn?
i agree with this, nice post.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-23-2011 , 05:01 AM
Would Beasley + Flynn get us our 2012 pick from the Clips?
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 12:24 AM
ty SP

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
Would Beasley + Flynn get us our 2012 pick from the Clips?
I'm pretty sure they'd laugh at that offer.

I think Flynn is the type of player who you throw into a multi-player deal to make the salaries work out. I think his value beyond that is close to zero.

Beasley has value, but probably not enough to get a high lotto pick in an expected to be good draft.

Clippergeddon is coming.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 12:59 AM
itd be so hilarious if the wolves traded for their own pick back and the clippers made it top-3 protected
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59


I'm pretty sure they'd laugh at that offer.

I think Flynn is the type of player who you throw into a multi-player deal to make the salaries work out. I think his value beyond that is close to zero.

Beasley has value, but probably not enough to get a high lotto pick in an expected to be good draft.

Clippergeddon is coming.
i think i mentioned this itt, but there was a rumor that indiana was willing to give up their # 10 pick last year for flynn. obv dont know if it's true, but anyway, i doubt flynn is worth anything and they should have jumped on that offer if it was real.

right now he's basically telfair from like 2-3 years ago, imo.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speel Posher
i think i mentioned this itt, but there was a rumor that indiana was willing to give up their # 10 pick last year for flynn. obv dont know if it's true, but anyway, i doubt flynn is worth anything and they should have jumped on that offer if it was real.

right now he's basically telfair from like 2-3 years ago, imo.
Flynn has as much trade value now as Telfair did 2-3 years ago, but his value on the court is hugely negative, where at least Telfair can play with a little competency.

Yes, the rumor is that Kahn basically laughed at Indiana & hung up on them like they were insulting him by offering the #10 for Flynn - he was bragging about that (brilliant!). If that's true, he should be fired for that alone, not that there arent plenty of other reasons to fire him.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 10:37 PM
From Chad Ford's latest Mock Draft:

Quote:
They could trade either player (Love especially would welcome a trade), but I'm not sure Williams is an upgrade. That leaves them with dealing this valuable asset and hoping to get back a few solid veterans to stabilize the team. So that's why I'm very confident Williams will go No. 2 -- I'm much less confident on which team will actually do the drafting.
I guess I was a little surprised to see the bolded portion.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 11:47 PM
You're surprised Love wants to get out of this mess?
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-24-2011 , 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yugoslavian
You're surprised Love wants to get out of this mess?
No. I'm surprised that they said that information w/o him publicly saying he wants out. Maybe I missed it, did Love at some time say he wanted out?
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-25-2011 , 12:15 AM
I don't think he'd do it publicly. But I think it's not a far reach to assume he'd welcome a trade. I didn't really want to bring it up in this thread to be too much of a killjoy as he's been the 1 bright spot. Buuuut, unless Rubio is as much or more than promised, I don't really see how the Twolves keep Love past his rookie contract. We'll see though, maybe the new CBA will make it easier for small market teams.

Also, and I kinda hate to say this too, but I'm not sure Love's trade value gets higher than *right now*. And due to the new CBA there could be a lot of teams willing to give up borderline superstars or even kind of superstars for him.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-25-2011 , 12:35 AM
I remember this from earlier in the season, but that is about it.

http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.c...oklahoma-city/

Quote:
Then there is this: Love told SI.com that during last summer’s World Championship in Turkey he had conversations with USA Basketball teammates Russell Westbrook (who played with Love at UCLA) and Derrick Rose about the possibility of someday teaming up in the NBA. Oklahoma City’s Westbrook and Chicago’s Rose are also permitted to sign extensions this summer.

“We all talk about playing together,” Love said. “It’s fun to talk about. When the time comes, we’ll assess the situation and figure it out.”
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-25-2011 , 03:28 AM
whispers of Ben Gordon for the #2 a brewin
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-25-2011 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
Flynn has as much trade value now as Telfair did 2-3 years ago, but his value on the court is hugely negative, where at least Telfair can play with a little competency.
yeah, i was comparing flynn now to telfair of like 3 years ago, where basically he was a highly touted draft pick that had 0 production and was a large negative for his team.

flynn is still young enough to figure things out i guess, but hoping for anything of value from him in a trade is not realistic imo.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-25-2011 , 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halstad
From Chad Ford's latest Mock Draft:


I guess I was a little surprised to see the bolded portion.
i dont think he has said anything in the media, but he's part of an awful team where the coach randomly benches him from time to time.

Rambis needs to leave and the team needs to show some major improvements if they want to have a chance at keeping love, imo
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote
05-25-2011 , 05:51 PM
trading love now might be good depending on what they could get for him. for instance, i would do it for the #1 overall.
Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time Quote

      
m