Minnesota Timberwolves- Re-re-rebuilding Time
07-09-2013
, 03:00 PM
07-09-2013
, 05:54 PM
07-09-2013
, 06:03 PM
yeah, they have interest in Brewer. bleh. He's a lot better than Alan Anderson, who they have also shown interest in for some reason, but I hope Brewer isnt the best we can do.
I dont know how any team can count on any rookie for anything meaningful before he's played a minute in the NBA.
Its clear (to Adelman and anyone else paying attention) they cant count on DW to produce at SF.
They obviously need more depth at SF.
They apparently value Luke+DW more than AK47 too.
I dont know how any team can count on any rookie for anything meaningful before he's played a minute in the NBA.
Its clear (to Adelman and anyone else paying attention) they cant count on DW to produce at SF.
They obviously need more depth at SF.
They apparently value Luke+DW more than AK47 too.
07-09-2013
, 06:30 PM
Quote:
yeah, they have interest in Brewer. bleh. He's a lot better than Alan Anderson, who they have also shown interest in for some reason, but I hope Brewer isnt the best we can do.
I dont know how any team can count on any rookie for anything meaningful before he's played a minute in the NBA.
Its clear (to Adelman and anyone else paying attention) they cant count on DW to produce at SF.
They obviously need more depth at SF.
They apparently value Luke+DW more than AK47 too.
I dont know how any team can count on any rookie for anything meaningful before he's played a minute in the NBA.
Its clear (to Adelman and anyone else paying attention) they cant count on DW to produce at SF.
They obviously need more depth at SF.
They apparently value Luke+DW more than AK47 too.
07-09-2013
, 08:17 PM
07-10-2013
, 01:24 AM
07-10-2013
, 05:27 PM
07-10-2013
, 06:36 PM
07-10-2013
, 06:37 PM
07-10-2013
, 06:59 PM
07-10-2013
, 10:22 PM
I don't think AK was ever a serious option. He wants 3+ years at like 8-10 mil per. They didn't want to pay that for a 33 year old who is injury prone.
I guess I'm the only one who doesn't think the Brewer deal is that bad. Yeah he was terrible the 1st time around but he has transformed himself into a useful role player. They needed a wing defender and he can do that. Obviously hes terrible on offense but they have more than enough of that already. Hes still only 27. Also he shot 41% on left corner 3's last year.
I guess I'm the only one who doesn't think the Brewer deal is that bad. Yeah he was terrible the 1st time around but he has transformed himself into a useful role player. They needed a wing defender and he can do that. Obviously hes terrible on offense but they have more than enough of that already. Hes still only 27. Also he shot 41% on left corner 3's last year.
07-10-2013
, 11:25 PM
07-10-2013
, 11:30 PM
I dont hate Brewer. He's a likeable guy, plays with energy and is maybe a little above avg defensively. He's cut down on TOs recently too. He is pretty bad overall offensively. I just saw a stat - over the past three seasons, on non-left corner threes, he's shot 19.5%. And he still jacks up a lot of them. He was under 30% on 3s overall last season, taking 3.7 per game. He'd be a fine ~$2.5 mil a year backup. Now we have him for 3 years at double that price. We way overpaid. That's the problem.
We've now spent $10mil on two backup SFs while happily watching AK leave for the same money, and he would have probably come back for ~3/21m.
PEK!
