Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
He might not be but it's still way too early to give up on him. He was a borderline NBA starter last year and is still very young at 21. He still has value and upside. He's been a young player somewhat overwhelmed by Adelman's rather complex cutting/spacing offense.
The only guys that get their rookie scale options decline are Thabeet-type total stiffs.
We dont agree on his upside. He has blinders on when he has the ball. He is very bad at defending quick players. He has a low BBIQ that is obvious to me and a lot of people who know more than I do. He's not Thabeet bad (or Wes or Flynn or Rivers bad), but if the Wolves cant trade him, I think declining his option would be way better than paying him $6.7m next season. That's way too much given what we've seen in two full seasons, and he has had opportunities. Players who have been given as much playing time as DW has very rarely make dramatic improvements that would justify him making $6.7m or $8.7m. His contract is horrible given his past performance and outlook.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
yes. We can't gain anything and can only lose. Sub-zero is far worse than a replacement player like Gelabale.
Sub-zero: 5.9 PER, -0.038 WS/48 (negative! or sub-zero)
Gelabale: 10.5 PER, 0.62 WS/48
Wes Johnson: 9.5 PER, 0.21 WS/48
He's a historically terrible player.
You are correct, but there is strong evidence that suggests Shabust will be in Rivers' ballpark as far as production goes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
let me throw another trade out there
lets say hypothetically dallas offers pek 13mill a year & we dont match
d.williams + ridnour/barrea/shved for asik a possbility at all??
yeah, if we somehow lost PEK, I would want Asik, and some combination of the above might work, but he has a goofy, complicated contract, so I'm not sure how that would work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
But we're gonna get Pek back for like the vet's minimum it looks like so it's a moot point
Right.