Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyenimator
And marathoners who run 150 miles/week aren't effective if they have a stress fracture. But they have to put in that training to be the best. Just like we have to run Denard 20 times a game to be the best.
And again, running QBs get injured just as often as pocket passers. I'd shudder to think what was going on in your head in 2006 when it was just Henne, with Cone backing him up.
I was actually ok with
Jason Forcier backing up Chad Henne, even though I was looking forward to seeing Antonio Bass in an increased role before he tore his knee up. People try to say that it was Mallett transferring that killed the program (he was leaving anyway, RR or not), but it was really Bass not being able to come back from that God-awful injury.
Anyway, David Cone--really?
Now that we are playing the meat of our schedule--teams that reall have a defense--and Denard is getting banged up, it has made him much less effective as a passer. Over the last three games--all games where he was depended on to throw because we were behind--he's averaged 169 yards, completed 58.6% of his passes thrown 3 TDs and 4 INTs . . . and his longest run has been 32 yards because they are taking the corner away from him with containment.
Mayber he has a longer way to go as a passer than we thought. The first few defenses we played were so bad, it is hard to really evaluate. Is his shoulder is hurt worse than we know (like Tate last year)? Or have defenses crafted sort of "Jordan Rules" for him? In other words, making us win with our complimentary players--when he makes plays on his own they justfunnell him into the heart of the defense and take shots at him that Laimbeer and Mahorn would be proud of.
It has been fun watching him make plays this year . . . but defenses are keying on him now. VS has been so ineffective, Hopkins isn't getting short-yardage carries, the coaches don't trust Cox, Teric Jones needs to be back in the secondary if he isn't going to get some run at RB, Shaw--still hurt???, and Fitz is probably out for the year (again). In short, the coaches seem resigned to make our offense a one-man show, and the non-Indiana Big Ten teams on our schedule have enough talent on defense to make us pay for it.
If RR wants to stick around, he's going to have to diversify. I'd just prefer not to get a majority of our yards and points when we are coming from behind and the defense is playing soft to prevent the big play.
Lastly: Pocket passers get hurt as much as running qbs? I'm not sure how to really go about getting a hard stat for that--you can slant that one any way you want it. All I know is that at the half-way mark of the last two seasons, running read option spread, our starting qb has gotten banged up and we started losing football games. Part of this is due to a drop in productivity from the qb after the point of injury, most of it is due to our schedule being back-end heavy and us not having a safety that can break a 4.6 40. The numbers speak for themselves when you look at them.