Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Michigan Football: HARBAUGH

11-21-2009 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NozeCandy
Defense should be interesting though.
I mentioned it during the 3rd quarter, but the more I think about it, lack of depth has to be a huge factor in the defense sucking in the second half of games. That will at least be addressed next year. Losing Graham and Brown (and perhaps Warren) obviously hurts, but I still think they will be significantly better.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:21 PM
Minor RAGE!

R.I.P.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GREEAR10
but gardners good...tate's bad. shoelace is awesome but should be returning kicks and have a small sample of packages at QB.
Yeah that huge sample size of Gardner at the college level is really convincing
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GREEAR10
keep loling ******ttttt.
Stop.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:23 PM
Gardner's passing ability rivals Pryor's. Look at his highlights - he needs help on his mechanics big-time.

no WAY is he ready to be a college starter right now
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
You said Tate didn't blow the game but we didn't belong on the field with OSU because we commit turnovers. That makes no sense. TATE made those turnovers. Period.
What I'm trying to say is Tate and the Michigan team as a whole played the way we would expect against a superior team with a one of the best defenses in the country. That's why saying Tate blew the game is going too far. We're not ready yet. It's that simple.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
I mentioned it during the 3rd quarter, but the more I think about it, lack of depth has to be a huge factor in the defense sucking in the second half of games. That will at least be addressed next year. Losing Graham and Brown (and perhaps Warren) obviously hurts, but I still think they will be significantly better.
You really are just figuring this out NOW?
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:35 PM
Depth at LB should in particular be better, we'll add Bell, Hawthorne, Jones, Cam Gordon, and M. Robinson. Ezeh should never, ever, ever see the field ahead of Leach or Fitz, and hopefully Mouton can finally get his head screwed on straight.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NozeCandy
Yeah that huge sample size of Gardner at the college level is really convincing
and the sample size of Tate being terrible and getting worse as they season went out and wearing down isn't convincing? he's so bad.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:45 PM
Has anybody heard the outcome of the Inkster game today?
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:48 PM
TF post-mortem:

I got these stats from forever ago, but I have some QB stats from BCS QB's from 2002-2007. Of these, there were 25, + Tate, who started as true frosh (100 attempts).

Tate's stats: 58.7%, 7.3 ypa, 1.3 TD/INT ratio, 4.6% TD %, 128.15 rating

By completion %, he is 6th out of 26
By YPA, 5th out of 26
By TD/INT, 10th out of 26
By TD%, 10th out of 26
By rating, 7th out of 26

So, fairly good, all things considered. I don't have sacks/fumbles/rushing yards, so that's incomplete.

Also, unlike, say, Henne in 2004, he clearly does not have an abnormally positive amount of talent around him (Braylon, in Chad's case) helping inflate his stats. Point is, he struggled, but he was a pretty successful frosh QB under the circumstances. I may not be telling anyone anything profound, but it's nice to see the comparison.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by heater
Has anybody heard the outcome of the Inkster game today?
I'm gonna go with Inkster 38 Opponent 15

Gardner 12-15 201 yards 15 rushes for 148 yards
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GREEAR10
and the sample size of Tate being terrible and getting worse as they season went out and wearing down isn't convincing? he's so bad.
He's a freshman. Writing him off now is so absurd.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by damaniac
TF post-mortem:

I got these stats from forever ago, but I have some QB stats from BCS QB's from 2002-2007. Of these, there were 25, + Tate, who started as true frosh (100 attempts).

Tate's stats: 58.7%, 7.3 ypa, 1.3 TD/INT ratio, 4.6% TD %, 128.15 rating

By completion %, he is 6th out of 26
By YPA, 5th out of 26
By TD/INT, 10th out of 26
By TD%, 10th out of 26
By rating, 7th out of 26

So, fairly good, all things considered. I don't have sacks/fumbles/rushing yards, so that's incomplete.

Also, unlike, say, Henne in 2004, he clearly does not have an abnormally positive amount of talent around him (Braylon, in Chad's case) helping inflate his stats. Point is, he struggled, but he was a pretty successful frosh QB under the circumstances. I may not be telling anyone anything profound, but it's nice to see the comparison.
but gardner is better...
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NozeCandy
He's a freshman. Writing him off now is so absurd.
when you have Gardner coming in...I mean...i think its more of letting the #1 recruit in the country at the QB position get his shine on.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:55 PM
Also, improvement: (I have no idea if GREARR is responding to me or not, since I don't read his posts. I trust whatever he is saying is truly profound though.)

So I never finished this, and one day I will, but I was also trying to see how much, on average, guys improve year to year based on experience, how long they've been starting, class, etc.

True frosh starters to true soph year:

Completion percentage on average increased by 2.6%, YPA by .75, TD/INT ratio .37 better, TD% by .26, and rating by 10.6 points.

So, I know you really can't do this, but as a very crude baseline, Tate might have:

61.3%, 8.05 ypa, 1.67 TD/INT, 4.95% TDs, 138 rating. Again, I know it doesn't work like that, but that's a pretty good statline. If nothing else, we've got a lot back on O too, so hopefully that helps him and the offense make a big leap. And you can expect, I think, him to cut down on the really bad mistakes. More than anything else, that would be worth a ton.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:57 PM


lolllllllllllll

IM SO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 04:58 PM
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by damaniac
Also, improvement: (I have no idea if GREARR is responding to me or not, since I don't read his posts. I trust whatever he is saying is truly profound though.)

So I never finished this, and one day I will, but I was also trying to see how much, on average, guys improve year to year based on experience, how long they've been starting, class, etc.

True frosh starters to true soph year:

Completion percentage on average increased by 2.6%, YPA by .75, TD/INT ratio .37 better, TD% by .26, and rating by 10.6 points.

So, I know you really can't do this, but as a very crude baseline, Tate might have:

61.3%, 8.05 ypa, 1.67 TD/INT, 4.95% TDs, 138 rating. Again, I know it doesn't work like that, but that's a pretty good statline. If nothing else, we've got a lot back on O too, so hopefully that helps him and the offense make a big leap. And you can expect, I think, him to cut down on the really bad mistakes. More than anything else, that would be worth a ton.
Those expectations seem realistic to me. Good work.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILOVEPOKER929
You really are just figuring this out NOW?
I'm sorry. I guess I missed all of your insightful posts on the subject of the defense. Everyones always bitching at GRob and talking about how bad the defense is. Depth hasn't been talked about once to explain the second half meltdowns.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:15 PM
FWIW I think Robinson is a decent-to-good coordinator and not entirely to blame for much of the defensive struggles this season

Check out Brian's UFRs for video proof - there's only so much you can do when two of your linebackers show some of the worst football instincts I've seen.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
I'm sorry. I guess I missed all of your insightful posts on the subject of the defense. Everyones always bitching at GRob and talking about how bad the defense is. Depth hasn't been talked about once to explain the second half meltdowns.
I'll admit I haven't mentioned it itt. I really thought it was too obvious. I've been talking about lack of depth screwing us on D in second halves for a while now with my family and friends. The trend has been apparent at least since The Illinois game. You can believe I'm lying if you like. Don't matter to me.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:19 PM
The savior
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TalkingDonkey
FWIW I think Robinson is a decent-to-good coordinator and not entirely to blame for much of the defensive struggles this season

Check out Brian's UFRs for video proof - there's only so much you can do when two of your linebackers show some of the worst football instincts I've seen.
I just hope Robinson isn't a poor recruiter as one person itt mentioned *may* be the case.

Also, if Ron Zook gets fired, I really wish Michigan would pick him up and put him in some minimal assistant role. That guy can recruit with the best of them.
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote
11-21-2009 , 05:22 PM
Michigan Football: HARBAUGH Quote

      
m