Detroit Lions: We're Going to Bite a Kneecap Off - Page 51 - Single-Team Season Threads -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events Single-Team Season Threads

Detroit Lions: We're Going to Bite a Kneecap Off

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 51 of 574

First

31 41 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 61 71 101 151 251 551

Last

Page 51 of 574

First

31 41 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 61 71 101 151 251 551

Last

11-14-2010 , 05:20 PM

#1251

vixticator

clutch

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 117,339

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheHip41

Vs. A team that's 0-8

was like when marino beat the 85 bears

also we broke record for most road losses in a row yipee!

Quote

11-14-2010 , 05:33 PM

#1252

EvilSteve

Midlife Crisis

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 13,195

2-7 and still more PF than PA. I'm not sure but I think if you've been betting the Lions with the point spread, you're doing very well.

Quote

11-14-2010 , 05:56 PM

#1253

hurdda

banned

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,985

Anybody see Kevin Walters TD http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201011...uars#tab:watch its the 2nd highlight

how is that a TD and CJ's in week 1 not?? Such a joke

Quote

11-14-2010 , 08:46 PM

#1254

TheHip41

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 27,047

Quote:

Originally Posted by hurdda

Anybody see Kevin Walters TD http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201011...uars#tab:watch its the 2nd highlight

how is that a TD and CJ's in week 1 not?? Such a joke

these are clearly different

CJ caught the ball, was tackled, and before he completed the catch the ball hit the ground and came loose = no catch

in this clip, the guy catches the ball and lands on his back with COMPLETE control the of the ball, and after he catches with COMPLETE control and is down the defender kicks the ball out of his hand.

not a close play at all, and a good call for TD

Quote

11-14-2010 , 11:05 PM

#1255

GREEAR10

banned

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 70,909

We are soooo bad without Stafford. We are really really good with Stafford. Sigh : /

Quote

11-14-2010 , 11:11 PM

#1256

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Hold up, we're mediocre with stafford. That's a huge improvement from last year, but again, let's not get crazy.

Quote

11-14-2010 , 11:19 PM

#1257

GREEAR10

banned

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 70,909

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Hold up, we're mediocre with stafford. That's a huge improvement from last year, but again, let's not get crazy.

Up 14-3 with Stafford thru game 1...

we beat the redskins in the only game he completes...

We are up 20-10 vs the jets when he leaves.

Ike, all the games we are losing without him are < 1 score games.

We are 100% better than "mediocre" with Stafford. I mean we have still outscored our opponents without him for 6-7 games for **** sake.

Quote

11-14-2010 , 11:39 PM

#1258

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by GREEAR10

Up 14-3 with Stafford thru game 1...

we beat the redskins in the only game he completes...

lol sample size

Quote:

We are up 20-10 vs the jets when he leaves.

and the reason we lost was more than Stafford going out.

Quote:

Ike, all the games we are losing without him are < 1 score games.

false

Quote:

We are 100% better than "mediocre" with Stafford. I mean we have still outscored our opponents without him for 6-7 games for **** sake.

We've outscored our opponents because for those 6-7 games because of 1 game. Football isn't hockey/baseball/basketball, adding up the points to determine a season's probably outcome doesn't work nearly as well... mostly because of lol sample size issues.

The Lions are nowhere near really good and that will continue to be true until the offense line and secondary improves.

Quote

11-14-2010 , 11:50 PM

#1259

GREEAR10

banned

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 70,909

LOL ike....seriously beginning to think you fake this whole being into sports thing.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:16 AM

#1260

vixticator

clutch

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 117,339

Lions are wayyyyyyyy better than record. Going to win like 9 games next year.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:18 AM

#1261

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by vixticator

Lions are wayyyyyyyy better than record. Going to win like 9 games next year.

Possibly, that's not really good though either.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:39 AM

#1262

thedeezy

My name is Carlos

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 26,256

If we had more yards per game, ikes would be drooling all over this thread

also, 9 games isnt "really" good, but please nit more. If this team won 9 games 3 years after going owen16 then its like going from a pinto to a GT500

Quote

11-15-2010 , 02:25 AM

#1263

GREEAR10

banned

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 70,909

ike likes soccer guys. don't be too hard on him.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 07:18 AM

#1264

TheHip41

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 27,047

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Hold up, we're mediocre with stafford. That's a huge improvement from last year, but again, let's not get crazy.

no way ike, we were dominating Chicago, we were dominating the Jets, if Stafford doesn't get hurt we easily win those two games.

We crushed the rams at home without him, and squeaked by the skins with him. If stafford plays vs. the bills it's probably a win.

so if he didn't have a pixie dust collarbone, the lions are 5-4 and are going to win the division. and i know you are going to say "if only good things happened" but it's true, if we have stafford the entire game vs. the jets and the bears, those are auto wins(not an auto win 100%, just when he went down, from that point, games were going to be wins)

Quote

11-15-2010 , 11:00 AM

#1265

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by thedeezy

lol nit more? I guess I should just magically transfer greear's post into something that is easily agreeable. The team has definitely improved, and more than I thought they had at the beginning of the season. Even with Stafford healthy the whole year, it's pretty freaking unlikely they would have won 10+ games, which is any reasonable standard for a team that is really good.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:16 PM

#1266

mjw0586

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 37,375

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Even with Stafford healthy the whole year, it's pretty freaking unlikely they would have won 10+ games, which is any reasonable standard for a team that is really good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vixticator

Lions are wayyyyyyyy better than record. Going to win like 9 games next year.

Plus... 9 wins isn't good but 10 wins is really good?

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:26 PM

#1267

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjw0586

Plus... 9 wins isn't good but 10 wins is really good?

Wat? I don't think so, but the bare minimum for anyone not crazy would be 10. You're not following the conversation very well. Greear and deezy aren't the same person.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:30 PM

#1268

mjw0586

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 37,375

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Wat? I don't think so, but the bare minimum for anyone not crazy would be 10.

It's amazing that you can be so results oriented in this thread and bash Greear and co. for doing it in the Michigan thread. It's quite possible for someone to think a 9 win team is better than a 10 win team and not be crazy. If the Lions win 9 games next year and continue to show improvement, it's very possible they are a good football team.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:32 PM

#1269

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjw0586

WTF are you reading? Who is talking about next year? JHMFC GMAFB.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:32 PM

#1270

mjw0586

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 37,375

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Greear and deezy aren't the same person.

Vix was talking about next year and deezy said "three years after 0-16" so I assume he's talking about next year too. You were talking about this year's wins/losses.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:33 PM

#1271

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjw0586

Vix was talking about next year and deezy said "three years after 0-16" so I assume he's talking about next year too. You were talking about this year's wins/losses.

No **** sherlock, yet you're talking down to me about next year. I'm talking to Greear about whether or not the lions win 10+ games with a healthy stafford.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:35 PM

#1272

mjw0586

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 37,375

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

WTF are you reading? Who is talking about next year? JHMFC GMAFB.

The people you are responding to are talking about next year.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:37 PM

#1273

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjw0586

The people you are responding to are talking about next year.

They need the same remedial work you do. I was nice to deezy and pointed out what we were actually talking about. The second time I have to do this I'm not going to be as nice.

Quote

11-15-2010 , 01:41 PM

#1274

mjw0586

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 37,375

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

They need the same remedial work you do. I was nice to deezy and pointed out what we were actually talking about. The second time I have to do this I'm not going to be as nice.

You know, it's not a requirement that people stick strictly to the ******ed arguments that you and Greear have. Vix and deezy are entitled to point out related things without you being an ******* and making the argument all about you. They're saying the Lions can win 9 games next year and be a pretty good football team. If you disagree with that, address it. If not, then just leave it alone. We don't have to debate only the things you want to talk about.