Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry_Sugar
Which teams have you used so far?
1 (Sep 3) Indianapolis over Oakland Correct IND 21, OAK 17 -
2 (Sep 10) Cincinnati over Pittsburgh Correct CIN 20, PIT 10 -
3 (Sep 17) New Orleans over Arizona Correct NOR 31, ARI 7 -
4 (Sep 24) Kansas City over New York (NYG) Correct KAN 31, NYG 7 -
5 (Oct 1) St. Louis over Jacksonville Correct STL 34, JAC 20 -
6 (Oct 8) Chicago over New York (NYG) Correct CHI 27, NYG 21 -
7 (Oct 15) San Diego over Jacksonville Correct SDG 24, JAC 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by splashpot
I'm not sure if you've already done this, but would you mind posting your general plan for the rest of the season so if we remember, we can look back in 6-7 weeks?
So, for the above (non-2p2, FWIW) pool, my plan through 14 looks something like this. List would be in order of descending preference for the week.
8
NEvMIA
DENvWAS
SF@JAC
SEA@STL
GB@MIN
9
GBvCHI
SEAvTB
NEvPIT
DALvMIN
10
TENvJAC
GBvPHI
SEA@ATL
11
SEAvMIN
PIT@DET
GB@NYG
12
HOUvJAC
DETvTB
GBvMIN
13
SFvSTL
DALvOAK
BALvPIT
14
DENvTEN
GBvATL
NEvCLE
BALvMIN
These would be my preferences each week, with the first team on each week being the one I'd pick right now if I had to. Obviously if there's a bad injury, I'd adjust accordingly. Weeks 10 and 11 are the only ones that seem highly exposed to being tough to pick based on potential injury (mostly Russell in 11) and prior selection (if I used GB in 9 and didn't want TEN for whatever reason in 10). I don't see the pool lasting this long though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by splashpot
It's a risk every single week, so the conclusion that you should come to is not to disregard the possibility of injury, but it should be to realize that your predictions are less reliable.
True, but at the same time, I don't think you can "pick scared" burning a highly valued asset when the risk of injury doesn't really justify it. Outside of QB, there aren't a lot of positions that would create catastrophic situations that would sway a team from being a huge favorite to a dog. It just doesn't happen that often. Additionally, I think allowing room for error (i.e. multiple options) is important because you can't just set a line and then never revisit it.
Going back to the Denver and Seattle vs Jacksonville games, I think it was silly to use either of them that week since they both have multiple 10+ point favorite games left on the schedule. In week 3 I took NO (-360) and in week 6 I took Chicago (-360) - both huge favorites that were unlikely to be as big a favorite in many (if any) games the future. Obviously, sometimes this comes back to bite you in the ass - in tdomeski's pool I had MIN vs CLE and a (-300) Vikings team **** the bed vs a team starting their 3rd QB, on the road, just after trading...etc.
----------
To flip the conversation a little, how do you pick teams to gain separation? Are you simply looking to pick the least popular team you feel comfortable with?
I hope this doesn't come off as contentious, BTW. I do think separation has value and will shade some picks based on what I think others in my pool will do, but until you get down to just a few opponents, it's difficult to guess where they're going to be. In the above pool, I am fortunate that most of their lines are pretty similar and I have some built in separation. Since their picks don't actually affect my ability to pick winners every week though, I think it makes more sense to focus on my winning rather than what they're doing.