Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawnmower Man
$5M up-front license fee for casino
$1M up front for vendor
14% of profits in addition to that
That's good news? I don't think there's any way those numbers make sense.
I agree states should not able to do this but it is how these things work (and those initial demands should be able to be negotiated down as well).
As far as the up-front licensing costs go, even if they made this deal with every state, it would still pale in comparison to what they are spending on advertising (obviously some states would be worth more than others just throwing it out there).
Also, they stupidly have been giving 35% of profits to affiliates since the start, so if they lowered that to a more reasonable number like 5-10% (which affiliates would still be all over -- in poker the affiliates gladly accepted just a few percent after the rakeback they gave back to the player was figured in) they could use that other 25-30% to find a balance between giving something to the states to make sure they can operate as well as more back to the players in the form of rewards (both of which will probably be necessary to sustain the industry), but obviously they were more concerned with reaching massive valuations than ever thinking about the long-term sustainability of the industry.
Last edited by Shoe; 10-22-2015 at 03:47 AM.