Quote:
Originally Posted by mrno1324
Say vs a BTN open. I get that we can call way more but why does that mean we need to 3bet less? In practice at least I'm inclined to actually 3bet more because their ranges are weaker and will fold more (especially great when considering rake).
But I can't really articulate a theorerical explanation for why the opposite is true other than "as the RFI size increases calling sucks more so 3bet more" but it seems counter intuitive to widen a linear 3bet range vs a stronger open raise range.
Your original statement is only true given static RFI ranges. Meaning if someones RFI 45% then your 3b vs 2x is < than if they 3x open. If they start folding a lot more when they 2x open due to having a much wider range (50% RFI for example) then you can and should 3b more.
The actual [main] reasoning is because you win more when they fold to your 3b.... nothing complicated.