In a 3bet pot oop, I'm finding that the solver splits between 2/3 and 100%, but bets range.

I found that a factor that makes it start potting range is playing 150bb deep instead of 100, and that makes sense as to why it ups the sizing overall.

But what factors are making it so that it's ok to just bet your range here? Is it just general range strength? I was thinking that only IP has 22 and has more 77, so there's no "nut advantage" but I understand that can be made up for by the strength of your overpairs and stuff.

So if that's the case it must also matter a lot that the boars is 3 gapped, because then IP has very little to possibly no 2 pair. I suspect that if the flop came T82 it would be much worse to slam the board, since now you have to contend with J9 T8 JQ etc.

Am I on the right train of thought here? Looking forward to feedback.

NOPE, T82 still gets Cbet with the same type of frequency but it just sizes down to 2/3. This is a tough one for me

Ahh, I thought of a reason. It could be because the range I used here was 3betting BB vs CO which is significantly stronger than I'm used to. Been studying lots of SB vs Btn lately. This could be what's throwing me off here. I'll look into this more tomorrow, and update with some screencaps of the parameters (I'm on a laptop remoting in so it's awkard)

board fairly disconnected which is good for oop so not a surprise, but depends on the ranges ur using... if you sim T76 it will use a small sizing likely or if you change T72 to monotone, or two tone betting frequency and sizing preference should move down

I think it's as you thought because OOP's range is stronger.

These boards do not change the strength of either range so OOP is betting big/often.