Quote:
Originally Posted by Lezaleas
What you are doing is fine indeed. Make sure that you are not focusing on the little things tough. So don't solve and then follow just your hand and then say something like "Ah, i should have bet 30% instead of 60% here". You mainly want to use the solver to undestand how poker is player on a macro strategic level, so that then you can deduce how the precise plays should be played by yourself as you find them. Always think about what the players should do in any spot and then check if the solver is playing close to that strategy. So your thinking should be more along the lines of "Well here our range is betting small because it puts max pressure on villain's weak holdings while risking the less possible"
Thanks, I wasn't looking at V's range compared to my sizing, I'll do that