For the Admins: I hope that they dont transfer this Post on ''general questions''
I type this post here becouse I want make theory consideration about ranges in relation with pot odds and eventually equity realization
The game is this:
5/10/20(5) 8players
I want analyze this situation where:
- we are SB, BB, STRADDLE
- we are CO, BTN
***You must put the straddle
So... I want make a comparision about 10/20 to 5/10/20(5)
10/20 => total pot 30, std situation where villain open 50 or 60
and BB need put 30 or 40 to win 110 or 130
we have p.odds% 50=>27.28%, 60=>30.76%
But this isnt the main point (for now....)
>>>Approuch from SMALL BLIND<<<
consideration:
If we are SB, need speak after us BB and STRADDLE (2 players)
How we can open? In a similar scenario, btn vs blinds need speak 2 players but we are IP.
Conclusions:
I think about a rfi not more bigger than a standard CO
At the end... the ''real SB'' in this game is BB
>>>Approuch from BIG BLIND<<<
consideration:
Situation RFI: here is correct a ''Limping Strategy''?
All fold, and we need to speak... pot 8 Ante of 5 = 40, SB fold (45total..) + blinds(30)
pot is 75 and we altrady put 10 into the pot.. so:
A- Open 3-4x
B- Limping 10 for win 85
And how much we need 3bet?
Is correct if we 3bet no more than a 3bet vs BTN in a normal game?
>>>Approuch from STRADDLE<<<
OK, straddle close the game and we need consider it like a big blind..
So.. In a normal game 10/20 we assume that BTN open 60=>30.76% and we have this odds...
So here the dead money are: 5+10+20+ 8*5= 75
BTN open 80(4x) for win 215.. odds% 27.9%
if btn open 90 (4.5x) for win 235.. odds 29.78%
if btn open 100(5x) for win 255... odds 31.37%
OK the final question is: In a normal game we 3x I have 30.76% pot odds, here i have 29.78% pot odds vs a 4.5x, CAN I DEFEND THE SAME RANGES?
He steal bigger becouse dead money is bigger than a normal situation, but my responsability of defence?
Thanks in advice for comment