So if we wanna compare Snowie action vs. what solver would do here is some example in simple situation.It goes SB bets pot,BB calls.I used GTO+ and did a simulation of Snowie play on lowest level NL20.
So board is Kh9c7s and we have Js9d.We bet 0.25 pot.Snowie says bet 100%.GTO+ solving for less than that with this combo 69%(entire range advise is bet 78%).BB calls.
On the turn comes Ac.Now Snowbot advice is bet/check 55/45%.We check.GTO+ solves 82.3% 0.25 pot bet for entire range and 78% for J9 that we hold.But action that went was SBCheck/BB bet pot/SB folds 100%.I did simulation scenario at GTo+ to be played like that.
And here is the deviation.GTO+ is calling almost 95%+ and the rest is raise,never folding cuz still finds +EV.Snowie is 100% folding vs pot size bet.
One of the principles of optimal play is that bluffing is often not a profitable play in and of itself.So as the pot grows ,in this situation,our disadvantage grows since we must pay off vilains value bets.Snowie choses to fold 100%.Is this a reason(or a strategy) because this is the lowest level(rake heavy)?I can't tell that.That's AI mind.
Last edited by disident; 02-13-2018 at 07:43 PM.