Two Plus Two Poker Forums Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read TwoPlusTwo.com

 Notices

 Poker Theory General poker theory

 04-13-2018, 10:47 AM #1 buggzilla centurion     Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Aisle Seat; 30,000 ft. Posts: 163 Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com This riddle was posted on 538 today. Would love to know what the braintrust here has to say: You are playing a standard game of Texas Hold ’em, in which you start with two cards. Five community cards will be dealt, and the object is to make the best five-card hand out of the seven cards available to you. However, you’re a perfectionist, and you’re only interested in making the best possible hand once the board has been dealt — such a hand is called the “nuts.” Which two-card starting hand is the most likely to make the nuts once the board has been dealt? Clearly, preflop, the hand most likely to win hot-and-cold is AA. But how does one approach the problem as stated; i.e., making the best possible hand once the board has been dealt? Thoughts?
 04-13-2018, 12:23 PM #2 CallMeVernon COTM Crusher   Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Not Vancouver, BC Posts: 3,055 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com I've only thought about it for a few seconds, but I think the answer has to be ATs. That way, most of the time you make a flush, it's the nuts; plus you can make the nut straight sometimes; plus the T in your hand blocks straight flushes more often than a higher Broadway card would. EDIT: Actually now I think it's AKs. It blocks fewer straight flushes, but aces full of kings is the nuts significantly more often than aces full of tens.
 04-13-2018, 02:19 PM #3 nolispeifaflaatoi enthusiast   Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 52 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com Off the top of my head I'd guess JTs. You can make the maximum amount of straights (which adds up to a ton of boards when you include different suit combinations), all of them are the nut straight (which isn't true for lower connectors), and being suited helps in that you can make straight flushes on flush boards where a regular straight wouldn't be the nuts.
04-13-2018, 05:46 PM   #4
Didace
Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13,186
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
 Originally Posted by buggzilla But how does one approach the problem as stated; i.e., making the best possible hand once the board has been dealt?
Start with figuring out how many of each type of board is possible and determining what those types are.

04-13-2018, 05:54 PM   #5
Lego05
Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 24,029
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
 Originally Posted by buggzilla This riddle was posted on 538 today. Would love to know what the braintrust here has to say: You are playing a standard game of Texas Hold ’em, in which you start with two cards. Five community cards will be dealt, and the object is to make the best five-card hand out of the seven cards available to you. However, you’re a perfectionist, and you’re only interested in making the best possible hand once the board has been dealt — such a hand is called the “nuts.” Which two-card starting hand is the most likely to make the nuts once the board has been dealt? Clearly, preflop, the hand most likely to win hot-and-cold is AA. But how does one approach the problem as stated; i.e., making the best possible hand once the board has been dealt? Thoughts?

ATs.

This riddle was also posted here in 2010:

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...?highlight=ats

I said ATs back then too:

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lego05 My initial thought was AKs or JT (JT I think is clearly wrong though) then I thought some smaller AXs (for some reason A7s popped into my head first) and I'm starting to settle on my guess being ATs.

Someone ran a simulation to get the answer and listed hands in the order that they are most likely to make the nuts. That post is here:

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...6&postcount=46

 04-13-2018, 07:15 PM #6 robert_utk old hand     Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: ValueTown Posts: 1,683 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com My thought was JTs. The linked thread proves however that CallMeVernon nailed it, ATs. I had discounted most full houses that are also possible ties with the exact same hand, and forgot those are the nuts as well.
 04-13-2018, 08:34 PM #7 whosnext Pooh-Bah     Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: California Posts: 4,412 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com I thought there was another more recent thread in the Probability Forum on this topic. I remember running many cases on a computer. Also, I thought that this was NOT a problem in which simulation is useful/needed since a computer can whip through all possible boards fairly quickly to determine how many of them give a given specific two-card hand the absolute nuts (for that board). Maybe I am remembering some other thread/question. Edit to add: after skimming the earlier thread, I seem to be very confused what is being asked and how it was answered. Last edited by whosnext; 04-13-2018 at 08:38 PM. Reason: edit added
04-14-2018, 02:16 PM   #8
ArtyMcFly
Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Enchantment Under the Sea
Posts: 7,945
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lego05 Someone ran a simulation to get the answer and listed hands in the order that they are most likely to make the nuts. That post is here: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...6&postcount=46
I'm not too surprised to see ATs, AJs, AQs and AKs are the top four, but I'm intrigued to learn that the next best are apparently A9s and A6s. A6s???

04-14-2018, 02:24 PM   #9
robert_utk
old hand

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ValueTown
Posts: 1,683
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly I'm not too surprised to see ATs, AJs, AQs and AKs are the top four, but I'm intrigued to learn that the next best are apparently A9s and A6s. A6s???

The 9 and the 6 block a ton of straight flushes and give more true absolute nut flushes for the ace, apparently.

04-15-2018, 05:34 AM   #10
whosnext
Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 4,412
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Today I wrote a program to determine the absolute nuts for any 5-card board in NLHE (i.e., the set of hole cards that are guaranteed to win the hand with that board).

I then looped over all possible boards for a few hole cards (one pair of hole cards at a time) and tallied on how many of the total boards possible, given that one player holds those hole cards, do those hole cards make the absolute nuts. Of course, given that a player is dealt a specific pair of hole cards, there are C(50,5) = 2,118,760 possible 5-card boards that need to be considered. So in the table below, 2,118,760 is the denominator for the Pct Board Making Nuts calculations.

Since looping over 2,118,760 possible boards and finding the absolute nuts for each board takes a fair amount of time, I have only so far done the calculations for 11 starting hands. These results are given in the table below.

RankHole CardsBoards Making NutsPct Boards Making Nuts
1
ATs
82,442
3.89%
2
AJs
80,995
3.82%
3
AQs
79,517
3.75%
4
AKs
79,023
3.73%
5
JTs
66,353
3.13%
6
A9s
63,639
3.00%
7
A6s
63,621
3.00%
8
A8s
63,479
3.00%
9
A7s
63,473
3.00%
10
JTo
62,276
2.94%
11
A5s
62,153
2.93%

Time permitting I will try to do another set of starting hands tomorrow and update the table when I have new results.

04-16-2018, 08:14 AM   #11
whosnext
Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 4,412
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Update with more results.

RankHole CardsBoards Making NutsPct Boards Making Nuts
1
ATs
82,442
3.89%
2
AJs
80,995
3.82%
3
AQs
79,517
3.75%
4
AKs
79,023
3.73%
5
JTs
66,353
3.13%
6
A9s
63,639
3.00%
7
A6s
63,621
3.00%
8
A8s
63,479
3.00%
9
A7s
63,473
3.00%
10
JTo
62,276
2.94%
.
11
A5s
62,153
2.93%
12
A4s
60,694
2.86%
13
A3s
59,204
2.79%
14
A2s
57,653
2.72%
T15
QJs
56,566
2.67%
T15
QTs
56,566
2.67%
17
KTs
55,994
2.64%
18
KJs
55,907
2.64%
19
KQs
55,848
2.64%
T20
QJo
49,676
2.34%
T20
QTo
49,676
2.34%
.
22
T9s
41,848
1.98%
23
T9o
38,789
1.83%
T24
KQo
37,122
1.75%
T24
KJo
37,122
1.75%
T24
KTo
37,122
1.75%
T27
98s
33,057
1.56%
T27
87s
33,057
1.56%
T27
76s
33,057
1.56%
T27
65s
33,057
1.56%
.
31
KK
32,750
1.55%
32
AA
31,118
1.47%
T33
98o
30,044
1.42%
T33
87o
30,044
1.42%
T33
76o
30,044
1.42%
T33
65o
30,044
1.42%
37
54s
29,451
1.39%
T38
J9s
28,213
1.33%
T38
T8s
28,213
1.33%
40
AKo
27,044
1.28%
.
41
54o
26,444
1.25%
T42
J9o
26,189
1.24%
T42
T8o
26,189
1.24%
44
AQo
25,981
1.23%
45
AJo
25,966
1.23%
46
ATo
25,951
1.22%
T47
97s
23,067
1.09%
T47
86s
23,067
1.09%
T47
75s
23,067
1.09%
50
K5s
22,613
1.07%

 04-16-2018, 09:22 AM #12 ArtyMcFly Carpal \'Tunnel     Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Enchantment Under the Sea Posts: 7,945 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com Your results are somewhat different to bachfan's. How does KK make the nuts more often than AA?
04-16-2018, 01:20 PM   #13
CallMeVernon
COTM Crusher

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Not Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,055
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly Your results are somewhat different to bachfan's. How does KK make the nuts more often than AA?
KK will make with the nuts with top set on a no-straight board more often than AA will (with an A on board, more straights are possible).

 04-16-2018, 07:53 PM #14 whosnext Pooh-Bah     Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: California Posts: 4,412 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com Yes, some of those figures do not agree with bachfan's earlier results. My guess is that I screwed up my logic somewhere. If I have time I'll try to look into it tonight when, in all likelihood, I'll have to re-run that set of starting hands.
04-16-2018, 08:07 PM   #15
R Gibert

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 934
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by whosnext
Update with more results.

RankHole CardsBoards Making NutsPct Boards Making Nuts
1
ATs
82,442
3.89%
2
AJs
80,995
3.82%
3
AQs
79,517
3.75%
4
AKs
79,023
3.73%
5
JTs
66,353
3.13%
6
A9s
63,639
3.00%
7
A6s
63,621
3.00%
8
A8s
63,479
3.00%
9
A7s
63,473
3.00%
10
JTo
62,276
2.94%
.
11
A5s
62,153
2.93%
12
A4s
60,694
2.86%
13
A3s
59,204
2.79%
14
A2s
57,653
2.72%
T15
QJs
56,566
2.67%
T15
QTs
56,566
2.67%
17
KTs
55,994
2.64%
18
KJs
55,907
2.64%
19
KQs
55,848
2.64%
T20
QJo
49,676
2.34%
T20
QTo
49,676
2.34%
.
22
T9s
41,848
1.98%
23
T9o
38,789
1.83%
T24
KQo
37,122
1.75%
T24
KJo
37,122
1.75%
T24
KTo
37,122
1.75%
T27
98s
33,057
1.56%
T27
87s
33,057
1.56%
T27
76s
33,057
1.56%
T27
65s
33,057
1.56%
.
31
KK
32,750
1.55%
32
AA
31,118
1.47%
T33
98o
30,044
1.42%
T33
87o
30,044
1.42%
T33
76o
30,044
1.42%
T33
65o
30,044
1.42%
37
54s
29,451
1.39%
T38
J9s
28,213
1.33%
T38
T8s
28,213
1.33%
40
AKo
27,044
1.28%
.
41
54o
26,444
1.25%
T42
J9o
26,189
1.24%
T42
T8o
26,189
1.24%
44
AQo
25,981
1.23%
45
AJo
25,966
1.23%
46
ATo
25,951
1.22%
T47
97s
23,067
1.09%
T47
86s
23,067
1.09%
T47
75s
23,067
1.09%
50
K5s
22,613
1.07%
Since your percentages are lower than Bachfan's, my 1st thought was you were missing things like both AA and AT can be the nuts on the same board, since AT has a quad blocker, but things appear to be more serious with your app e.g. 76o > 65o, since 76o can make more nut full houses.

Another possible misstep can happen by missing flushes with a str8 flush blocker.

All these possibilities might be causing the lower percentages you are generating. It's tricky.

 04-16-2018, 09:46 PM #16 whosnext Pooh-Bah     Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: California Posts: 4,412 Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com Thanks for your comment. I am definitely capturing (or I am intending to capture) ALL the hands that are the nuts (or effective nuts) on each board. So that is not obviously the reason my code is finding fewer nut boards than Bachfan. And, yes, I tried to capture Axs being the nuts (the effective nuts) when the x blocks any possible straight flushes. But maybe I screwed that up. I haven't turned my attention to identifying where my code is screwing up but I do have a question. It may be obvious, but why "should" 76o make the nuts on more possible boards than 65o can? It is not immediately obvious to me.
04-17-2018, 01:06 AM   #17
nolispeifaflaatoi
enthusiast

Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 52
Re: Poker Riddle from FiveThirtyEight.com

Quote:
 Originally Posted by whosnext It may be obvious, but why "should" 76o make the nuts on more possible boards than 65o can? It is not immediately obvious to me.
There are more boards with 776 and two cards under 6 than there are boards with 665 and two cards under 5.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Links to Popular Forums     News, Views, and Gossip     Beginners Questions     Marketplace & Staking     Casino & Cardroom Poker     Internet Poker     NL Strategy Forums     Poker Goals & Challenges     Las Vegas Lifestyle     Sporting Events     Politics     Other Other Topics Two Plus Two     About the Forums     Two Plus Two Magazine Forum     The Two Plus Two Bonus Program     Two Plus Two Pokercast     The Best of Two Plus Two Marketplace & Staking     Commercial Marketplace     General Marketplace     Staking - Offering Stakes     Staking         Staking - Offering Stakes         Staking - Seeking Stakes         Staking - Selling Shares - Online         Staking - Selling Shares - Live         Staking Rails         Transaction Feedback & Disputes     Transaction Feedback & Disputes Coaching & Training     Coaching Advice     Cash Game Poker Coach Listings     Tournament/SNG Poker Coach Listings Poker News & Discussion     News, Views, and Gossip     Poker Goals & Challenges     Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance     That's What She Said!     Poker Legislation & PPA Discussion hosted by Rich Muny     Twitch - Watch and Discuss Live Online Poker     Televised Poker General Poker Strategy     Beginners Questions     Books and Publications     Poker Tells/Behavior, hosted by: Zachary Elwood     Poker Theory     Psychology No Limit Hold'em Strategy     Medium-High Stakes PL/NL     Micro-Small Stakes PL/NL     Medium-High Stakes Full Ring     Micro-Small Stakes Full Ring     Heads Up NL     Live Low-stakes NL Limit Texas Hold'em Strategy     Mid-High Stakes Limit     Micro-Small Stakes Limit Tournament Poker Strategy     STT Strategy     Heads Up SNG and Spin and Gos     Mid-High Stakes MTT     Small Stakes MTT     MTT Community     Tournament Events Other Poker Strategy     High Stakes PL Omaha     Small Stakes PL Omaha     Omaha/8     Stud     Draw and Other Poker Live Poker     Casino & Cardroom Poker         Venues & Communities         Regional Communities     Venues & Communities     Tournament Events         WPT.com     Home Poker     Cash Strategy     Tournament Strategy Internet Poker     Internet Poker         nj.partypoker.com         Global Poker     Commercial Software     Software         Commercial Software         Free Software General Gambling     Backgammon Forum hosted by Bill Robertie.     Probability     Sports Betting     Other Gambling Games 2+2 Communities     Other Other Topics         OOTV         Game of Thrones     The Lounge: Discussion+Review     EDF     Las Vegas Lifestyle     BBV4Life         omg omg omg     House of Blogs Sports and Games     Sporting Events         Single-Team Season Threads         Fantasy Sports     Fantasy Sports         Sporting Events     Wrestling     Golf     Chess and Other Board Games     Video Games         League of Legends         Hearthstone     Puzzles and Other Games Other Topics     Politics     History     Business, Finance, and Investing     Science, Math, and Philosophy     Religion, God, and Theology     Travel     Health and Fitness     Laughs or Links!     Computer Technical Help     Programming International Forums     Deutsch         BBV [German]     Français     Two Plus Two en Español

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.

 Contact Us - Two Plus Two Publishing LLC - Privacy Statement - Top