Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbk_killer
1. Is "bet river HU with high card" a good enough approximation for "bluffed river" or can I use a better choice of filters? Kinda surprised to only see 50 hands as I didn't think I was that nitty
Is it possible to set a PT filter to "hand strength < TPGK" or something like that. I would presume that you sometimes bet a weak pair as a bluff, and that should bring up your proportion of "non-value bet hands" to a few more than your current 50 out of 391 total bets. Although it
might be fine to seldom bluff in your game, especially if you often use small sizes on the river, only bluffing about 13% of the time would indeed be nitty.
FWIW, here's what HEM gives me if I run the line analysis on myself for the filter "bet river" on a small sample of recent microstakes hands.
As you can see, I was betting with TPGK or better 68% of the time. I only had total air (high card) 21% of the time, but I also bet some hands that were worse than TPGK as bluffs (maybe there was some super thin value with TPwK). My 68:32 ratio might actually be a little bit "too bluffy" given that my river bet-size is usually less than pot, but I suppose my range is
reasonably balanced. If your range was truly weighted in a 341:50 ratio, it's surprising your bets ever get called, as you'd be extremely value-heavy, and observant villains would stop paying you off.