Quote:
Originally Posted by just_grindin
Idk I'm dumb sometimes? I was just thinking Idk how B would make money by incorrectly calling with bluff catchers even if he knows A is underbluffing. So if B is losing money on the call it has to go somewhere which should be to A.
Maybe my mistake is in thinking it's always enough to compensate for A stealing the pot with some frequency with his bluffs.
Player B would make the most money by never calling if player A is underbluffing.
So yes, the money he loses by calling goes to player A.
But player A doesn't make the most money by underbluffing against any calling strategy from player B <= 50%.
If player B never calls, player A should bet all his bluffs (not betting insure he losing the pot)
If player B calls 25%, he should bet all his bluffs (they are automatic profitable)
If player B calls 50%, he can do whatever he wants with his bluffs because they are indiferent, ev doesn't change. But any strategy that is not betting all the bluffs are exploitable (by player B never calling with bluff catchers)
Thus player A will bet all his bluff always.
Player B can call with any frequency between 0 to 50% with the same ev (because player A will always bluff against any of those strategies) and player B will be indiferent with his bluff catchers to a balanced bet always.
Last edited by Maroel; 11-28-2017 at 06:37 PM.