Quote:
Originally Posted by Omg_Nat123
Thanks for the math I tend to go with what seems logical in my brain.
I wasnt going by raw equity and get it in obviously, I just thought about the spot and would assume villain is over folding a bunch so thought we could mix in some weaker holdings as a 4bet bluff.
Id assume 99+ is getting it in depending on villains perceived % though.
Would also assume hundreds of top regs have looked at this spot and come to the conclusion that a linear range is best and not to get out of line.
a linear range has nothing to do with not getting out of line here. We are "bluffing". It`s just that since we don`t have a call range we can pick our best folding hands as bluffs and our range ends up being linear. It has nothing to do with not wanting to bluff. If we had a calling we should still bluff almost as much with hands like Axs SCs and some A grabage etc like when we 3bet.
as for not having a call range, it has to do with the pot odds offered being terrible, there`s not many hands that can pay 9bb to see a flop they are not a clear favourite, while not even closing the action
Btw, I did the math back then and, long story short, we can cold 4bet 13,33% of the original raiser`s range for every position, half of it for value(as in, it will call the shove), and half of it as bluff(wont pay the shove)
the numbers are slightly different for every position tough, in particular the "AK/QQ now can value" jump between CO/MP
Last edited by Lezaleas; 02-18-2019 at 08:12 AM.