Quote:
Originally Posted by siebenacht
[...] My main point was that it's bad to generally avoid limping. You just completely misunderstood my stance that it's okish not to limp in deepstacked games, whereas in shorthanded/stacked games not to limp is a huge leak. I am sorry for my imprecise formulation...
Instead of just discussing and talking about your view on the topic you attack a minor sidenote that wasn't even clearly formulated. I never said "it's bad".
convos like these are just confusing me. in my very first post ITT, I quoted this part of your first post
Quote:
Originally Posted by siebenacht
If you argue limping is bad in deepstacked games, yes. Saying limping should be generally avoided is just very superficial and terrible advice.
where you clearly say that limping in deepstacked games is bad. I didn't miss your stance at all because everything else you said makes sense, that's why I implied that you worded it imprecisely, saying
Quote:
Originally Posted by samooth
i think you meant to say it differently, but as is, oh the irony
and so on. I'm not trying to attack you, I just wanted to clarify - as others have done in the meanwhile as well - that limping is good/optimal in a lot of deepstacked spots, some that are very obvious like sb vs bb, and others that might not seem obvious and in contrast to conventional 2p2 wisdom. peace