If I understand your question correctly, I believe this should answer it. This is taken from an article written by Adam Jones on out of position strategy. Here is what he says:
"It's acceptable to overfold, even from a GTO point of view. This is probably one of the bigger mistakes that more advanced players are making in recent times. The application of the minimum fold equity formula leaves players making pretty big mistakes in their range construction OOP.
Let’s say we face a 2/3rds pot cbet OOP on the flop. If our opponent’s bluff works more than 40% of the time he is generating automatic profit. So it’s common for players to make sure they defend over 60% of their range. 60% to make sure that villain does not make automatic profit, and then another 5% on top to compensate for any equity villain gets to freeroll when we just call.
So the short version of the story is, we now have a player who is only folding 35% to cbets OOP and is using “GTO” to back up his decision. Sadly, he’s not going to do very well in this situation, because he has applied GTO principles incorrectly. It’s very important to remember that the minimum fold equity formula produces simply an estimate which we must adjust based on a range of factors. In this scenario it’s very important to keep in mind that our opponent simply has a huge positional advantage. It is actually impossible for us to prevent him from generating automatic profit. It is important to accept this and factor this in to our range construction.
There is a decent chance we should be folding more like 50% of the time to cbets when we are OOP facing a 2/3rds pot bet. Is it really true to say that our opponent is generating automatic profit though? Not exactly. It’s true from one perspective but untrue from another perspective.
If we focus purely on an isolated hand where we are out of position, then yes, our opponent is making automatic profit. The mistake is to think that the way we counter this is by an adjustment to our defending range in this specific situation. It’s not. The way we defend against this is by generating automatic profit when we ourselves are IP and firing a cbet.
Our opponent will either need to overfold himself, or defend a range which is wide enough to be unsupportable on later streets. So if we take two optimal opponents and factor in both scenarios, one in position, one out of position, then no automatic profit is being given. So the idea behind GTO modeling is not to create unexploitability in one specific scenario but to create an equilibrium which exists across the entire game."
The link to the full article is here:
https://www.pokervip.com/strategy-ar...poker-strategy
Hope that helps!