Open Side Menu Go to the Top
FAQ Today's Posts Search Twitter Discord
Register
A general solver question ? A general solver question ?
Post Reply Subscribe
...
07-22-2021 , 04:32 AM
#1
dude45
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By dude45 Find Threads By dude45
veteran
Join Date: Sep 2019 Posts: 2,802
when dealing with limited ram is it ok to have a large number of bet sizing's for solves that use a small amount of ram. Three and 4 bet pots for example and a small number of sizing's for ram intensive spots like BTN versus BB SRP. Or do i need to keep everything uniform and give the solver the same betting options regardless of the situation?
A general solver question ? Quote
07-22-2021 , 05:40 AM
#2
Brokenstars's Avatar
Brokenstars
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By Brokenstars Find Threads By Brokenstars
Verified Coach NLHE
Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 16,093
Size of the game tree is going to mostly be a function of:

1. Stack depth
2. Allowed sizings/raise sizings/donk sizings/bets etc.
3. Hand range

In a 3bp/4bp stack depth and hand range decreases which does lower the size of the game tree, therefore if fully utilizing an amount of ram of lets say 16gb, then you're going to be able to have more allowable sizes in the lower SPR spots compared to a single raised pot.
A general solver question ? Quote
07-22-2021 , 02:17 PM
#3
tombos21's Avatar
tombos21
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By tombos21 Find Threads By tombos21
veteran
Join Date: Sep 2018 Posts: 2,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by dude45
when dealing with limited ram is it ok to have a large number of bet sizing's for solves that use a small amount of ram. Three and 4 bet pots for example and a small number of sizing's for ram intensive spots like BTN versus BB SRP. Or do i need to keep everything uniform and give the solver the same betting options regardless of the situation?
You can and should use different trees for different spots.

In general your goal is to maximize the gamespace while keeping the tree efficient enough to solve with your hardware. Tailor your bet sizes to the stack depth - 4bet pots trend towards smaller bets compared to single raised pots.

I'm wondering why you'd want to keep the bet sizes the same?
A general solver question ? Quote
07-23-2021 , 11:11 PM
#4
dude45
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By dude45 Find Threads By dude45
veteran
Join Date: Sep 2019 Posts: 2,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by tombos21
You can and should use different trees for different spots.

In general your goal is to maximize the gamespace while keeping the tree efficient enough to solve with your hardware. Tailor your bet sizes to the stack depth - 4bet pots trend towards smaller bets compared to single raised pots.

I'm wondering why you'd want to keep the bet sizes the same?
i didnt know if it would mess my overall game up if i had say 3 sizings per a street in one spot and 1 sizing per a street in another
A general solver question ? Quote
07-23-2021 , 11:14 PM
#5
dude45
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By dude45 Find Threads By dude45
veteran
Join Date: Sep 2019 Posts: 2,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brokenstars
Size of the game tree is going to mostly be a function of:

1. Stack depth
2. Allowed sizings/raise sizings/donk sizings/bets etc.
3. Hand range

In a 3bp/4bp stack depth and hand range decreases which does lower the size of the game tree, therefore if fully utilizing an amount of ram of lets say 16gb, then you're going to be able to have more allowable sizes in the lower SPR spots compared to a single raised pot.
I know and in spots where both players both players have a large range and a high stack to pot ratio the only way to save ram is to to limit bet sizings. I dont really like to restrict the solver by telling it cant take this action or that action.
A general solver question ? Quote
Post Reply Subscribe
...
      
Feedback is used for internal purposes. LEARN MORE
Contact Us Privacy Statement TOS
Top
Powered by:  Hand2Note
Copyright ©2008-2022, Hand2Note Interactive LTD
m