Quote:
Originally Posted by Yadoula8
I have well and truly had enough of these guys. I'm only talking about the experienced players who have hounded me with abuse for years. If you don't think I deserve this abuse then understand that Ive essentially cracked exploitative theory, and I've come to realise that these guys have a mental problem called cognitive dissonance which basically makes them go completely insane when they meet someone like me.
This makes me think that my comparison of you to anarcho-capitalist Ayn Rand fanboys talking about statists is 100% accurate.
You come across as someone who suffers from grandiosity, someone who perceives yourself as uniquely capable of solving poker, someone who everyone else is secretly envious of, someone with a pompous demeanor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yadoula8
At Level three, we consider what the opponent thinks that we have... is it possible to bluff without considering that in some way??
I have seen many players bluff, then justify it by saying that the only way they could win the pot was to bluff, without considering what their opponent has or what their opponent think they have. They only considered the cards in front of them and believed they had a hand that had no chance of winning at showdown.