Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingkong352
In my example MP open 5$, SB 3bet 20$, BB fold, MP 4bet to 48$, SB would shove (180$ more). We know that MP will only call 6 combos out 35.7 combos. so he calls 6/35.7, or 16.81%.
So I calculate like this :
0 = 70(0,8319) + (0.1681)(402X - 180)
Do both villain's cover the 180 raise? If so then they both started with 228 and the total final pot should be 456 not 402. It doesn't change the calculation though.
So the way I would approach this question is notice that the only way this equation can ever be negative is if
(0.1681)*(402*X-180) < -70*(0.8319)
Less than meaning a more negative number.
So if we multiply everything out:
67.5762*X - 30.258 < -58.233
So now here is the question, is it possible to add a positive numer to -30.258 to reach -58.233? The answer should be no.
Now let's go back to our original equation we can test this out. Let us assume you have 0 equity when called. We'll remove the equals 0 for now:
70(0,8319) + (0.1681)(-180)
58.233 - 30.258 = 27.975
So you don't need ANY equity for this play to be profitable and setting the equation equal to 0 makes no sense.
Now let's assume you know that calling instead of jamming has an EV greater than 27.975. At that point you could determine how much equity you would need to make jamming better than calling.