Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy?

08-01-2017 , 02:36 PM
Had a disagreement with a friend on this and was wondering if anyone could clarify. We would like to know how to calculate (if possible) how to estimate effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy.

Here is an example of what I mean:

We have KQo vs villain in a 3b pot. We assume villains range on this theoretical river as (TT-AA). We expect villain to only have 30% of their QQ-AA (70% are 4bet by villain). If villain is randomly choosing 30% of these combos, how do we determine combos blocked? I assume it's less than the 3 combos of KK and 3 combos of QQ that would be blocked by a non-mixed strategy.

Last edited by PathsOfGlory; 08-01-2017 at 02:45 PM.
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Quote
08-01-2017 , 03:34 PM
I hope I'm understanding your scenario correctly. So Villain in this river spot would have 30 percent of QQ-AA and we block QQ and KK. So each combo of queens and kings would represent 5 percent and you can deduct combos from there. Only exception is like, if you know villains mixed strategy depends on what suits he plays. Then you could maybe possibly take whole hands out of the picture. Like if you know he'll always be flatting with the Qd or something 4 betting rest, etc etc..

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Quote
08-01-2017 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpDog
I hope I'm understanding your scenario correctly. So Villain in this river spot would have 30 percent of QQ-AA and we block QQ and KK. So each combo of queens and kings would represent 5 percent and you can deduct combos from there. Only exception is like, if you know villains mixed strategy depends on what suits he plays. Then you could maybe possibly take whole hands out of the picture. Like if you know he'll always be flatting with the Qd or something 4 betting rest, etc etc..

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
30% as in 70% of villain's QQ-AA would not
be here even if we held 23o so 0.3 x 18 possible dealt combos = ~5-6 total QQ-AA combos with no blockrts held. I'm also assuming complete randomness in how villain decides call v 4b (no specific cards). How do you get the 5% you mentioned?

Last edited by PathsOfGlory; 08-01-2017 at 04:01 PM.
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Quote
08-01-2017 , 10:00 PM
6 combos make a pocket pair. This goes down to 3 when we have one blocker, so they show up 3/6 = 1/2 as often. 1/2*.3*6 = .9 combos.

Villain's range looks like this: {TT (6), JJ (6), QQ (.9), KK (.9), AA (1.8)}
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Quote
08-02-2017 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
6 combos make a pocket pair. This goes down to 3 when we have one blocker, so they show up 3/6 = 1/2 as often. 1/2*.3*6 = .9 combos.

Villain's range looks like this: {TT (6), JJ (6), QQ (.9), KK (.9), AA (1.8)}
This is what I was looking for, thanks!
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Quote
08-03-2017 , 01:38 PM
After card removal there are 12 combos of TT/JJ, and 12 combos of QQ+. Since the numbers are equal, 30% of the time he'll have QQ+. You can do this calc in your head.
Effectiveness of blockers vs. a mixed strategy? Quote

      
m