6max hyper Cnet adjusted - Poker Theory - General Poker Theory Forum

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy Poker Theory & GTO

6max hyper Cnet adjusted

Post Reply Subscribe

...

04-29-2016 , 06:52 AM

macroking

newbie

Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 16

Apologies if in wrong section.

I've played over 300 6max hyper sng's for decent results. 39% ITM an ROI 15%.

my cnet adjusted however suggests that I should be well down like 60 buyins lol.. can someone explain this to me?

It is the only type of sng/tournament where my cnet is not even close to my actual results. And not once out of the 300 sample size is my cnet equal to $3.96 (1st place profit in a $1.50 hyper). This doesn't make sense to me. Its not like i'm playing bad. According to icm calculators most of my all in decisions have been spot on

Quote

04-29-2016 , 07:35 AM

just_grindin

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 5,263

I don't know if this will help (didn't read the whole thread) but similar question on poker tracker forum:

https://www.pokertracker.com/forums/...p?f=58&t=44168

Quote

04-29-2016 , 07:56 AM

macroking

newbie

Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 16

thanks for the reply. i've seen that thread but still makes no sense haha. WIll post another one in PT forum see what they have to say

Quote

04-29-2016 , 11:04 AM

just_grindin

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 5,263

Quote:

Originally Posted by macroking

thanks for the reply. i've seen that thread but still makes no sense haha. WIll post another one in PT forum see what they have to say

I'm not familiar with tournament stats so I don't know if your numbers are good or bad relative to the field, but if I'm reading that other thread correctly it would appear the poster pointed to poor itm performance for negative cnet.

How does the break down (1st,2nd,3rd) of your 39% itm look?

Quote

04-29-2016 , 11:57 AM

macroking

newbie

Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 16

Quote:

Originally Posted by just_grindin

1st 22%
2nd 16%
3rd 15%

All of the regulars have itm (1st+2nd) around 36-40%

Here's a picture of my graph. Its quite bizarre because my Cnet started going up when I started studying ICM more, so doesn't make sense to me why cnet adjusted is down alot!

Quote

04-30-2016 , 07:24 AM

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Yeah, I've seen this over much larger samples. I'm pretty sure that the PT4 C Net Adjusted line is quite biased for shorthanded SNGs.

Quote

10-05-2017 , 04:22 PM

Take99AllDay

newbie

Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 17

This is a pretty old thread but I am in the exact same situation! Im going with it's biased as my ICM decisions are excellent and i've been studying! Also at the $1.50 Hyper

Quote

Post Reply Subscribe

...