Quote:
Originally Posted by Discipline
I thought you'd be moving this thread since it's about NLHE/PLO and not poker in general.
People seem to misunderstand my position daily. I don't have anything against NLHE. This post is an example of something more theoretical about NLHE or PLO. The posts I object to are ones that pretty much immediately dissolve into "what's the best way to play KQo from the small blind when a loose raiser completes from the CO"
If you can't see why the post here is different from my example, then it probably all seems kind of arbitrary but to me the line is generally pretty clear. I would have similar objections if someone posted a stud high questions like "so a LAG player raises from 3rd position with xxA and I have Q2Q, should I fold, call or raise?". These are practical, not theoretical, issues.
Anything that involves talking about an optimal line for a particular situation in a particular game, is probably not really "theory".
Edit: PS the main reason I give a damn is that most practical questions about NLHE are going to get FAR better answers in the right forum than here. No offense to the NLHE skills of regular PT posters, but the more focused a forum is on a particular issue, the more focused answers you'll get.