Quote:
Originally Posted by violi
And is it easy for you to do something as specific as Ax 8y 5y, for example? (Personally I've had some memorable big pots with a 6-7 offsuit especially when the turn card is 4z. But perhaps it's an illusion of a selective memory.)
Easy on the scale of maybe 15 minutes work to set up the filter for it and then run the scan. Is that something that would be useful information? Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jewbinson
spade, I hope this isn't too much to ask, but could you please do a statistic analysis for all (if not, some) of the micros?
I don't have any NL hands with less than $0.25 big blind. About 3/4 of what I have is in the range of the stuff I posted, up to $4 BB, and the rest is higher stakes or other Holdem formats (and some Omaha). I'll be getting some more hands soon but probably not micros.
Quote:
Originally Posted by violi
When do you think your research will be published? Would you consider posting a pre-print at xxx.lanl.gov in the statistics sectioni?
I don't get why they would be interested in it. Is that a serious question? I'm not going to be writing a formal paper suitable for any kind of academic journal, and I'm not a PhD anyway. I'm just going to publish my findings on a web site where people can discuss it. And I'm a curious guy. The flop distribution stuff is only one of the areas I'm working on. I'm also doing turns and rivers, all-ins preflop, correlating things to stack size, and so forth. Some of the ideas grew out of the rigtard debates, where before now no one had any real data. I do. Another purpose is to recognize and quantify unknown card removal effects.
Last edited by spadebidder; 11-15-2009 at 11:39 PM.