Quote:
Originally Posted by aner0
BvB it will cost him massive amounts.
BB vs BU it will cost him less because SB will be there to punish BU into opening a close to normal range. In a real scenario SB is very unlikely to punish BU in this way and BU will open much wider to take advantage of BB.
BB readjusting later to account for his previous leak is how a nodelock works as a default.
It might depend on how you take the meaning of "the worst 10% of the hands it should call with."
Looking at GTO Wizard 100bb NL500 rake, BvB, BB folds 42.7% of hands, calls 41.2% of hands,and 3bets 16.1% of hands. Of the hands it calls with, 41.2% of 1,326 combos works out to 546.3 combos, and 10% of that works out to 54.6 hands. That is how I interpret, "the worst 10% of the hands it should call with." As a native English speaker I am pretty sure that is the literally meaning of that phrase. However, I could see how one might think, "the worst 10% of the hands it should call with," as being 10% of 1,326 total combos, or 132.6 combos, the lowest EV combos of the 546.3 combos you are supposed to call with.
But if we are using the former definition, then consider K7o, K6o, 97o, 98o, 87o, 76o, 65o, 54o, 94s, 93s, 62s all mix calling and folding (K7o, k6o, 94s, 93s all mix 3bet as well). They are all 0 EV. Q8o is also 0 EV but it only mixes call and 3bet. If you add up all the times that these combos call, if I did my math right plugging the call % times each combo from GTO Wizard, it is 53.4 combos. Then 98o and 73s are pure calls but only have 0.01bb EV, and that is enough to get us past 54.6 combos with less than two combos having just 0.01bb EV. Under that definition, it seems hard to imagine how this equates to massive amounts.
If we are talking about folding 52.7% of hands instead of just 42.7% of hands, then yes that seems like a big leak.