Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUSTtheDRAWCESS
Since according to you I seem to have no idea how unreliable less sizes are, can you explain to me why that is the case.
If everything I've been told about solvers is wrong, I'm open minded enough to be corrected
Using less sizes is not the worst of all sins, but I can comfortably say that it's not as accurate as using more.
That's mainly for a reason, the solver doesn't just "solve the poker game".
It solves "the poker game you create".
Which means that if you put size x and y the solver is assuming that it is
impossible to use any size which is different from x and y.
This implies that the solver is assuming that the opponent is only using size x and y.
Unfortunately in real life our opponents use way way more than just 2 betsize so the assumptions the solver is making are not reflecting the real game.
this is the main reason why I'm saying that it is less reliable.