All you would have to do is play premium hands. It is never going to assume an unbalanced approach and will still randomize. Problem is you are always coming in with the best hands which means you are winning a vast majority of the time. It will fold out weaker hands 30 % of the time, call for a bit 30 % of the time and bluff 30 % of the time and it will get absolutely crushed.

You will lose some blinds as you go for orbits looking for that perfect starting hand. But GTO assumes you are balanced which you purposely wouldn't be.

People get confused by this approach because they think "GTO shouldn't be exploitable" and they reference rock/scissors/paper. But that game is not hierarchical. A rock is = to scissors = paper. But AA is not equal to 7 2.

You would simply be taking advantage of a bot that is not able to adjust to you.

You will lose more than you gain, otherwise, you wouldn't be playing against a GTO solution. In fact, that's the actual definition of Nash Equilibrium.

"A strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium if no player can do better by unilaterally changing their strategy" 1

Has Yadula returned to stir the pot again?

Please my brain

Unless it's a troll, then good one

You just try to minimize number of decisions you have to make and minimize average pot. The fewer decisions you have to make the less likely you are to make a mistake and size of a mistake is proportional to the size of the pot.
So if you can fold you fold if you can jam you jam if its indifferent between xr and xc you xc ect.

You may indeed own the bot in some spots by using such a strat but it will own you even harder in other spots.