I feel comfortable OB flop and turn because I just stick to 150%, but the river is complicated because you should in theory make massive overbets sometimes.
My issue with that is actually pulling the trigger with bluffs in the same spot. I know balance is not that important on low stakes but I want to have a strategy that at least is not that evident. And feel I could actually be bluffing and value betting on the same spot.
Look at this hand, I should in theory shove 92bbs on a 16bb pot OOP with some nut flushes and some nut blockers (AKo here is 1/3 but AQo would have been a shove). That would be almost a x6.
Random villain could be a calling station or a nit. It feels kind of like a shot in the dark with both value and bluffs when you don't have any read.
Do you think a move like that would be advisable against randoms in microstakes as a routine?
I was thinking in using some kind of boundary around SRPs:
Something like sticking to x1.5 max when SRP above 2.5 (so it doesn't feel as painful to bet/fold).
And using something like x2.5 as an upper limit when that would be an allin on SRPs 2.5 or lower and deciding to overbet, instead of giving great odds on villain check raise bluffs by overbetting 1.5 on a srp of 2 or something.
Maybe this could be a good start as I get more comfortable with overbets and hopefully climb up stakes?
I guess it should capture most of the important OB spots EV playing 100bbs deep and maybe reduce variance / possible tilt?
Thanks!