Currently I'm using a simplified one size flop strategy for Single Raised Pots IP based on texture.

I'm checking range OOP on SRP.

Using 1/3 on 4bet pots, and 1/3 on 3bet pots IP.

Currently working on a basic cbet sizing strategy for 3bet pots OOP and I have found the next on the solver solutions for SB vs BU 3bet pot OOP:

1/3 is still the favorite on most boards, except No Straight No monotone Low boards where it prefers 3/4 by far.

On disconnected suited boards though, it usually splits the range between 1/3, 3/4 and checks, around one third each line.

For example T92s, AQ6s, etc.

What are most regs doing nowadays with this?

What are you doing on this spot?

What do you think would be more convient for small stakes?

I'm doubting between playing a range bet of 1/3 or using 3/4 with more checks.

I think I heared Galfond commenting on a video he would go for a range 1/3 bet on a board like K97s, so I guess not spliting have it's benefits (easier to be balanced).

Splitting may be ideal but I fear not being able to pull it off decently.

Thanks!

I'd say you have the option between using either sizing, and should decide based on which sizing your population will play worse against. Try taking a look and how the solver responds to each sizing and compare with how you think villains will actually respond in game. Often you can find that one sizing prompts more mistakes than another.

Another thing worth trying is experimenting with different calling ranges, for the BTN in your scenario. I ran SB v BTN 3B pot sims in Pio against a moderate 10% BTN calling range, and also against a potential loose recreational player's 22% calling range. On T92ss for example, you can see vs the looser range the solver only uses a larger sizing, but splits sizings vs the tighter range.

(from an aggregate report comparison)

Hey man this is really interesting thanks for the answer.