LJ vs BB, 100bb, SRP.
Flop Jd7d5s.
LJ bets 3/4, BB calls.
Turn Ac.
LJ bets 3/4.
This is a hand analyzed on a video from the youtube channel "Finding Equilibirum".
https://youtu.be/IP6IueiW4H8?si=kwzcyIWOfCxiS4Bk
The author tell us the solver prefer this size on the turn over bigger ones because we put more hand on a difficult spot. Like second pairs and weak draws villain has plenty, which would have an easier fold against bigger sizes.
In my mind, this idea is clashing with the theory for overbetting, which we tend to do when we have a big nut advantage with our range (this same channel has videos talking about that), and it seems we have a considerable nut advantage here:
Is there a way to conciliate this apparently two contradicting ideas, or is something wrong in the ideas or my understanding of them?
Curious to hear your opinions.
Regards!
Last edited by Drefaz; 05-23-2024 at 02:41 AM.