What's the difference in rake on BBJ Tables? - RPM Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Internet Poker RPM Poker

What's the difference in rake on BBJ Tables?

...

04-27-2011 , 01:22 PM

king_nothing_

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,378

How much more is the rake on the BBJ tables compared to regular tables? Should I try to avoid them completely? I probably would, but the problems with that are: 1) I plan on multitabling, 2) there aren't many tables running as it is, and 3) the majority of tables running at 100NL and 200NL are BBJ tables. It doesn't seem like I'll be able to be too choosy with my table selection. How much harder would it be to be profitable at BBJ tables?

Any good insight here would be appreciated.

04-27-2011 , 01:28 PM

correllium

grinder

Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 675

From what I can gather, BBJ tables generate an additional $0.50 in rake per pot that is greater that $5.00

04-27-2011 , 01:33 PM

banned user

banned

Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 369

just run REALLY bad and the bbj tables will be profitable for you

04-27-2011 , 01:37 PM

Online Veteran

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 3,609

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJH

just run REALLY bad and the bbj tables will be profitable for you

Not necessarily.

04-27-2011 , 04:01 PM

NameOnTheCake

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 19,597

3.5 bb/100 from what I've heard. I'd love to see a 100k+ hand graph from the FR bbj tables

04-28-2011 , 07:22 PM

NiomNiomPokerChips

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,906

do u get rakeback for bbj lol

04-28-2011 , 08:24 PM

99moproblems

banned

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 465

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiomNiomPokerChips

do u get rakeback for bbj lol

04-28-2011 , 11:32 PM

muckthatsht

adept

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 822

These tables might just be the fishiest ones out there though...

04-29-2011 , 01:00 PM

Online Veteran

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 3,609

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiomNiomPokerChips

do u get rakeback for bbj lol

You get it back for the standard rake, not the bbj rake, correct?

04-29-2011 , 01:19 PM

#10

king_nothing_

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,378

Um, why was my title edited? It's not like I'm throwing around false accusations or something. Is there any lie in stating that rake on BBJ tables is, in fact, worse?

If you're going to police everything in this forum to prevent anything slightly negative from being posted about this poker room, I'll just post my questions elsewhere on 2+2 from now on.

05-05-2011 , 05:33 AM

#11

five4suited

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 9,026

Quote:

Originally Posted by NameOnTheCake

3.5 bb/100 from what I've heard. I'd love to see a 100k+ hand graph from the FR bbj tables

this is the rake at the standard tables.

05-05-2011 , 10:33 AM

#12

Systolic

banned

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 21,002

Last edited by Systolic; 05-05-2011 at 10:34 AM. Reason: already answered

05-05-2011 , 11:35 AM

#13

NameOnTheCake

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 19,597

Quote:

Originally Posted by five4suited

this is the rake at the standard tables.

*additional

...