Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Not exactly. I am asking whether positions exist where 2400s IN GENERAL more often (at least in the days before computers were well studied) play what we now are almost sure is the better move than what the very best players do (or did). Maybe like making the two point in backgammon with 64 or perhaps certain limps in poker when first in.
My answer remains the same. I don't think there's a specific type of position that the average 2400 plays better than the average 2700.
Are there exceptions sure - some super positional or tactical 2400 might be better in certain positions than a well rounded 2700 but it's a very individual thing, not a general one.