Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
What to do after basic development of pieces? What to do after basic development of pieces?

11-07-2012 , 04:45 PM
Hi guys,

This is a pretty typical situation for me, I go through a more-or-less standard opening and into the beginning of the middle game, and I reach a point where I realise there is no more obvious/basic development and it's time to start "playing", so to speak, and I feel slightly lost or overwhelmed by potential options.

What are the lines I should be thinking along and the things I should be looking for in these situations? I know from what limited experience I have that at this point any mistake I make against a decent opponent will pretty much lose me the game, and as I am a beginner I am usually playing people better than me against whom I can't afford to give any advantage away.

Any thoughts, advice, words of wisdom etc. will be warmly appreciated.

What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote
11-07-2012 , 04:56 PM
create weakness
exploit weakess
profit

example of weakness, be2, ne5
What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote
11-07-2012 , 05:54 PM
Yeah you're basically looking for things to attack. I like Ne5 here with the idea of Be2 or f2-f4-f5.

Your rooks and bishops are "developed" but you can tell they aren't active. Look for plans to make them active like the moves above.
What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote
11-07-2012 , 06:15 PM
This question is way too generic. It's sort of like asking "when should you check-raise in poker."

But ok, some general things you should be on the lookout for:

- moves that establish your Knights on strong central squares (like Ne5 in this position - note that Black can't take this Knight because of the upcoming pawn fork).

- Moves that open lines for your rooks, bishops, or Queen (for example f4 following Ne5).

- Moves that create weaknesses in the opponent's position or attack the opponent's weak points (in this case, I would be considering Be1-h4 after Ne5 and f4, in order to attack the Knight on f6, which is the only defender of the weak pawn on h5).

When playing human players, it's also a good idea to try to think about what they are planning. If the opponent's threat's are dangerous you might need to take defensive actions. If not, you should worry about improving your own position.
What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote
11-07-2012 , 06:15 PM
start by removing "standard" from your opening book.
What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote
11-10-2012 , 10:02 AM
After fully completing development generally one looks at the 5th and 6th ranks to see if the opponent has any weaknesses there first. Look for pawns or squares that cannot be protected by other pawns or will create other permanent weaknesses if the are protected. One example in the current position is the pawn on h5. You can bring a couple of pieces to attack it pretty quickly, and he has only one piece defending it easily. True, he can play g6 to protect this pawn, but this would really help you more than it helps him. It would create permanent weaknesses on f6 and h6, which he has a very hard time compensating for. Note that he has no dark squared bishop and you do. This means he would be weakening a set of squares (around his king, no less!) that you have power over and he doesn't. This is a recipe for disaster.

I didn't look any deeper at this position than that (mainly because omg those pieces) but this is just an example of how to create a plan. Next you would want to list the moves you have available that contribute to executing this plan (where do you want your pieces to go ultimately? how should they get there?). These will be your candidate moves. Analyze each move carefully and choose the one that looks best from there.
What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote
11-13-2012 , 03:56 PM
Your question is indeed too generic, but there are some guidelines you should keep in mind to help you make good decisions after the opening and "standard" development of pieces has ended. It is very important that you should try to understand the position, in terms of:

1. king's safety Basically, if your king is exposed (you haven't castled yet, or the pawn structure defending your king is not the way it is supposed to be) you should think of ways to make it more secure. Furthermore, if your opponent's king is vulnerable for the same reasons stated above, you shoud try to make energic, threatening moves, so he doesn't have the necessary time to secure it.

2.Pawn structure Regarding the pawn structure you should identify the weak pawns (yours and your opponent's, ofc) and the weak squares (sqaures that cannot be defended by a pawn). You should, by all means, avoid damaging your structure and try to exploit your opponent's weaknesses.

3.Good pieces, bad pieces After the development of the pieces is over, there will almost certainly be pieces that can find a better square where they should get. The good pieces dictate the plan to regroup the bad pieces so that finally, they will cooperate for the same strategic reasons. In case bad pieces cannot be repositioned, you should try to exchange them as soon as possible.

4.Center and space The most important part of the chess table, where all the actions revolves around is the center. You should try to occupy it and control it with most of your forces and also gain some space advantage by means of advancing pawns (space advantage is,in fact, the second most important positional advantage in chess, besides king's safety)

That being sad, the principles stated above can be applied in the position you are reffering to, in the following ways:

1.Both the kings are safe, so there is no reason to make defensive moves or generate chaos in order to stop black from defending his king.
2.Although the pawn structure is symmetrical (both sides have one pawn for each column), notice the "loose" pawn on h5. One plan could be to try and attack this pawn by means of Bd3 but as you will see, black easily defends it by g7-g6.
3.White's development went nicely, so there are no bad pieces on his side. Maybe the bishop on c3 is pretty misplaced, due to the fact that it is blocking the c2 pawn, which could advance to c4 and threaten black's center. Black is quite ok also, but notice his bishop on c8. It is still on his initial square thus preventing the rooks from communicating via 8th line. Also, there is no good square for this bishop, as black's center pawns are blocked on white squares, limitating the c8 bishop's activity. Very important to observe here is that white posesses the pair of bishops, which is a deadly weapon in open positions. So we must open the center and exchange a couple of pawns to open this position.
4.As of space advantage, neither side has any. We may say black is a little better from this point of view due to the advanced pawn on h5, but being so marginally, it doesn't help much. Regarding the center, white has a little advantage. His extra black bishop help control the e5 square, a critical square in this position.

So, if you put the pieces together, and remember what you must do, you will get to the right moves and plans. For example:
a) White has to prepare the advance of the c-pawn.
b) White has to open the position for his pair of bishops

That being sad, the right plan is : b2-b3 followed by Bc3-b2 and c2-c4 (maybe Ra1-c1 before, but not necessarily)

I hope I made a good point, as this is my first post on 2+2. Hello, fellow Poker&Chess Players
What to do after basic development of pieces? Quote

      
m