I like it if it's a humorous disclaimer ("wink wink these are great bets"). If it's a serious one, you could get rid of it; you aren't responsible for what adults do with their money.
I like it if it's a humorous disclaimer ("wink wink these are great bets"). If it's a serious one, you could get rid of it; you aren't responsible for what adults do with their money.
Thought it was obvious enough that it was a humorous disclaimer
You may want to edit the last line of the first paragraph. Due to the seemingly neverending race war in Ferguson, this tournament is sort of the secondary battle for [white vs. black] supremacy in St. Louis.
Jen Shahade "what were odds that Carlsen would get the same opponent in round one this time he lost to last time, we calculated it as something like 350 to 1"
Well, the next sentence (after Seirawan gently suggested that the odds might be a bit shorter) was something like "and then to lose to the same opponent again, it must be thousands to one".
I would never think Carlsen would play such a poor game as White.
If someone just showed me that game and didn't tell me where it was from or who were the players, no one would be able to convince me that White was played by Carlsen.
Fancy play syndrome much Magnus?
Last edited by All-inMcLovin; 08-23-2015 at 11:06 PM.
We can probably have an actual thread for the Sinquefield Cup, rather than leaving it in low content. Here's my recap of the first round for those interested.