Quote:
Originally Posted by UATrewqaz
Black is to move. Black is up two pawns (currently anyway) but White is starting to get some semingly dangerous pressure going.
This may be a completely non-exciting, standard position, I'm not sure.
Thoughts?
This position sucks for black and black is the only one in actual immediate danger of losing this regardless of the material deficit the activity of white's pieces , inactivity of black's pieces, and horrible placement of black's king combined with open lines leading right to him.
There are only two lines off the top of my head even worth considering, if we play Rg8 to combat a Qh5+ with Rg6, white captures Qxf5 and threatens Rxf6+ afterward winning the Qd7. I don't know how this line works out but it doesn't seem so great after, ...Rg8. Qxf5 Qc6 (getting off d7 and threatenting mate. Qxh7+ Kf8. White can guard the mate and white's queen is actually suddenly trapped for the time being and our king is actually safer than before white activating two of our inactive pieces... however by giving back the 2 pawns I can't declare ourposition equal without at least a pawn for it so this line is probably 2nd best to...
Qb5 Qh5+ Kg8 Rxe7 Rxe7 Rxe7. In this case black gets to keep one of the pawns but white's position actually looks slightly better than in my last line. It's really debatable here but this is one of the lessons I would cover in any lessons. The path of greed in chess isn't usually the best course of action , especially when so many opponents pieces are better placed than ours.
POD