Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
I am rated about 1700 elo. I prefer playing open games and am trying to develop a repertoire which involves as little theory as possible. To this end I recently picked up John Emms' "Attacking With 1. e4" and am learning his repertoire. He recommends the Closed Sicilian, which I have never played before. Most of the section is taken up with lines after:
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
The problem with this is that I am finding that virtually nobody under 1800 elo actually plays g6. Today I faced this:
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 e5
4. Bg2 Nf6
f4 immediately seems sensible, but what should the long term plan be? Should I be castling K-side or Q-side? Trying for a K-side pawn storm, or attempting to break up Black's Maroczy bind-like structure?
see some games of michael adams and nigel short here
www.chesslive.de
move those
1.e4 c5 2.Nc3
and put white field adams and search
they played a nice system adams even against kasparov in linares 99
and this one defeating Anand in 98
http://chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1419104
pretty simple system for white
1.e4
2.Nc3
3.g3
4.Bg2
5.d3
6.Be3
7.Qd2 (threatening Bh6 which can be played next)
8.Nge2
9.h3(maybe h3 before)
10.0-0
sometimes white can bigcastle(most time not,tho)(Very rarely its good, possibly only if black also big castles or plays some stupid line with b6 that slows his pawn attack)
white tries to play Rae1 then f4(or simply Nf4-Nd5) and if black plays b5-b4 Nd1 is fine... then sometimes even ive seen from Short Ne2 to c1 to defend a2 if Qa5 is played, or something like this.
then c3 can be played
white doesnt have necessarily to play f4 sometimes g4-Ng3 is better or Nf4-Nd5
but well, be a man.
study a proper repertoire. its much more powerful believe me. forget this "as little theory as possible" u can have a solid repertoire without tons of study throw that book in your trash can
a wise american oldman once said "Chess is theory."
Last edited by bradpittbr; 12-15-2009 at 03:11 AM.