In the fun Kasparov Endgame thread (
Link), Ajezz mentioned corresponding squares and I'm sure there are a few posters here who might be a little confused by this phrase. I know it took me quite a few years of playing before I found a clear explanation. So here's an introduction that I hope will help out newer players or anyone who simply hasn't gotten a good explanation before.
Definition
Dvoretsky defines Corresponding Squares as "squares of reciprocal zugzwang". Awesome, but what does
that mean? "Zugzwang" describes a situation where one player is put at a disadvantage because he has to make a move. i.e. passing your move would be a better option than moving. "Reciprocal zugzwang" means that whichever side to move is at a disadvantage because they have to move. This may sound esoteric or confusing, but it'll make sense after we see a few examples.
Dvoretsky also helps us out tremendously by listing the 3 most commonly seen cases of corresponding squares: opposition, mined squares and triangulation.
Opposition
This is an example of close or simple opposition. The kings are on the same file and have one square between them. Whichever king is to move does NOT have the opposition. The opposition is key to this position. If white has the opposition (black is to move), then white can win. If black has the opposition (white is to move), then it's a draw. Great, but how does this relate to corresponding squares? In this case e5 and e7 are corresponding squares. They are squares of reciprocal zugzwang because whichever side is to move is at a disadvantage.
Mined Squares
Okay, you've probably heard of opposition before, but what are mined squares? Mined squares are squares where you must not place your king before you opponent does. Again, if you place your king on one of these squares, your opponent will be able to immediately place you in zugzwang.
The two question mark squares are "mined". If either king steps onto one of them, then the opposing king can step onto the other and immediately win the enemy pawn. These squares are corresponding because if both kings are on those squares, then whoever is to move will lose.
What are the two "mined" squares here?
Triangulation
Triangulation relies on understanding which squares are corresponding. Let's look at a classic example to see how this works.
Here it's white to move. Can white immediately make progress from this position? No. If we have this same position, but with black to move, can white make progress? Absolutely. After 1 .. Kc8 2. Kb6 white wins easily. So what can we say about c5 and c7? They are corresponding squares. With the kings on these squares, you'd prefer your opponent have to move. Okay, are there other corresponding squares? Let's look at another possible position for the kings.
Again, can white immediately make progress if he is to move? No. 1. c7+ Kc8 2. Kc6 drawn. If black is to move, can white make progress? Absolutely 1 ... Kc8/Ke8 2. c7 and white wins. So we have two more corresponding squares: d6 and d8. So we should start thinking about the position like this:
The two A squares correspond and the two B squares correspond. Are there more corresponding squares? Absolutely. From d5 and c8, the kings can go to either of the corresponding squares that we've already established. So d5 and c8 also correspond. Then you figure out where the kings can threaten to go to C and A from and you end up with this:
So from the initial position, the winning line goes 1. Kd5 Kc8 (C for each) 2. Kd4 Kb8 (D) 3. Kc4 and black has no legal corresponding square - b7 is controlled. 3 ... Kc8 4. Kd5 back to the C's only now black has to move 4 ... Kd8 5. Kd6 and white wins. Other tries by black also lose.
Please ask questions or clarify these points if they don't make sense!