Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** *** Chess Low Content Thread ***

04-23-2010 , 08:17 PM
Steinitz variation is 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5.

2. e5 is not good. It is basically a loss of tempo as the pawn on e4 was not attacked. It does nothing for White's development. Black can basically either just ignore the move and play 2... d5 as planned (when White's probably should transpose to the Advance variation with 3. d4, which is certainly not the critical test of the French). Or Black can play a Sicilian set-up with 2...c5 when the pawn on e5 is looking a bit silly.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-23-2010 , 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrushinFelt
The French:

1. e4 e6

Why not 2. e5?
Better question for you to answer is: why? (seriously, before deciding against a move, you should at least see that it would benefit you in the case that we can't find something wrong with it)
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-23-2010 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Better question for you to answer is: why? (seriously, before deciding against a move, you should at least see that it would benefit you in the case that we can't find something wrong with it)
Turns out it mostly ends you up in the same spot as other variations. Played a few games with it. Pretty "meh"
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-24-2010 , 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrushinFelt
Turns out it mostly ends you up in the same spot as other variations. Played a few games with it. Pretty "meh"
But that doesn't really answer the question. Why is it that you considered the move to begin with? What is it that you were hoping to gain by playing it?
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-24-2010 , 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
But that doesn't really answer the question. Why is it that you considered the move to begin with? What is it that you were hoping to gain by playing it?
Make black a little more cramped. Simple as that.

I end up losing tempo pretty quickly or end up in the same spot as the other French variations.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-25-2010 , 03:23 PM
Code:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7
Why 5. ... Be7 and not Nxe4?
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-25-2010 , 03:30 PM
Heh...

Link to Nxe4 games
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-25-2010 , 03:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrushinFelt
Code:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7
Why 5. ... Be7 and not Nxe4?
Taste? Nothing wrong with Nxe4 and playing the Open Spanish. Be7 leads (generally) to the Closed Spanish systems.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-25-2010 , 04:15 PM
Let me ask a follow-up then. Why is white willing to sacrifice that pawn?
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-25-2010 , 04:23 PM
This is not a sacrifice. Black can't keep the pawn. After 5...Nxe4 White plays 6. d4 and Black has to give up the pawn because of the pin in the e-file. Play usually continues 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6. Only this is the starting position of the Open Ruy Lopez.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 11:34 AM
Where online can I just find a chess board where I can mess with the pieces as I see fit to explore different variations?
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrushinFelt
Where online can I just find a chess board where I can mess with the pieces as I see fit to explore different variations?
http://www.chess.com/analysis-board-editor.html
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 05:46 PM
Stupid question:

How do you name diagonals that run right to left when looking at the white side. Is it the f1-a6 diagonal or the a6-f1 diagonal. h1-a8 or a8-h1, etc? I think I've seen both in books and I always go in number order (f1-a6). There's no disagreement about the other direction since letter and number order are identical.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 08:48 PM
srs question:

Are conjoined twins allowed to compete in chess tournaments? I would think having two brains would give them an unfair advantage, but otoh, not allowing them might violate the americans with disabilities act or something.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy
srs question:

Are conjoined twins allowed to compete in chess tournaments? I would think having two brains would give them an unfair advantage, but otoh, not allowing them might violate the americans with disabilities act or something.
How are they going to use both brains? Only one can play at a time. If they share one body, then only one hand gets to make the moves.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajezz
This is not a sacrifice. Black can't keep the pawn. After 5...Nxe4 White plays 6. d4 and Black has to give up the pawn because of the pin in the e-file. Play usually continues 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6. Only this is the starting position of the Open Ruy Lopez.
Thanks Ajezz.

But what about this?

1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.Bb5 a6
4.Ba4 Nf6
5.O-O Nxe4
6.d4 exd4
7.Nxd4 Nxd4
8.Qxd4

Then move the knight to safety and white has no middle pawns and white has lost a pawn.

Or

8. Re1 Nb5
9. Rxe4+ Be7

And now black is ready to O-O.

Seems like black can keep the pawn if he's willing to trade knights.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 10:47 PM
7. Re1
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-26-2010 , 11:25 PM
oic

thx
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-27-2010 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by garcia1000
7. Re1
I didn't know anything about this line, so I looked it up. Amazingly, black appears to reach ~ equality in this line. The main line is rather complex and contains at least two chances for black to get a perpetual check on white's king. The end of the main line is this position:



Honestly, this line looks like a great line to prepare for use against higher rated players or anytime you'd be happy with a draw. Not a whole lot of critical sidelines, infrequently used, and with a complex endgame that's ripe for home analysis. Only downside is that white can force black to take the perpetual.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-27-2010 , 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swingdoc
How are they going to use both brains? Only one can play at a time. If they share one body, then only one hand gets to make the moves.
They don't need more than one hand to make moves obv. But they could communicate through facial expressions or body movements.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-27-2010 , 02:01 PM
Where's the perpetual?
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-27-2010 , 02:10 PM
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 exd4 7. Re1 d5 8.
Nxd4 Bd6 9. Nxc6 Bxh2+ 10.Kxh2 Qh4+ 11.Kg1 Qxf2+

10.Kh1 Qh4 11.Rxe4+ dxe4 12.Qd8+ leads to the endgame given by swingdoc.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
04-27-2010 , 02:18 PM
here's a little exercise from a corres game i played against a friend:



Evaluate 1.-Rxb6. (especially a possibly resulting pawn ending)
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
05-02-2010 , 09:50 PM
Question for you guys, since I'm not real sure on this.

Let's say you're playing somebody, and early on you get a piece up, (not a pawn, knight/bishop/rook/queen). Is it generally a good idea to start trading pieces or does it depend on the difference in skill between the players, and maybe other factors?
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote
05-02-2010 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey OT
Question for you guys, since I'm not real sure on this.

Let's say you're playing somebody, and early on you get a piece up, (not a pawn, knight/bishop/rook/queen). Is it generally a good idea to start trading pieces or does it depend on the difference in skill between the players, and maybe other factors?
Trade em all. The pieces, that is. Try to keep your pawns.
*** Chess Low Content Thread *** Quote

      
m