Going by memory and hopefully I recall correctly, but Maurice made a name for himself as a commentator on Intel sponsored
Professional Chess Association events in the mid 1990s, particularly the Intel Rapid Grand Prix events in New York. He brought an exciting style of commentary to the rapid games, heavy with sports analogies, making them much more spectator friendly. This was in large contrast to the dry and reserved style of commentary of those who came before.
I don't think his question was particularly absurd. But it's not really something that Nepo could answer truthfully. He has to know he has no hope of winning the match at all, and that all he can hope for is to not blunder in any more games and maybe even win one, to make the result less embarrassing.
Also I can understand why, in today's world, GMs don't want to make themselves look foolish by suggesting something every spectator's engine can refute in seconds. Many weak players are completely disrespectful toward strong human players who have accomplished more in this game than those weak players could ever hope to do in any aspect of life.