Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU

11-07-2014 , 11:12 PM


I did a rollout at 2592 trials and was very surprised at GNU's analysis of the position.

The way I see it, I have a clear double and white has one of those takes that you hate to take, but probably should. GNU marks my double as "very bad" and that white should take. I'm pleased that my opponent passed the cube, but I would like to gain a better understanding of the reasoning behind the analysis.

My main obstacle is obviously bringing my midpoint checkers in safely, and then I will have to clear out my outfield points before bearing off.

I have five spare checkers to dump on the 7 and 8 point and another on the 6 point. White will have to drop his midpoint very soon, making it easier for me to clear my midpoint, as I can leave an indirect shot if need be. I don't see clearing my midpoint as a big problem most of the time.

Once I do clear my midpoint, I certainly like my chances against the 4 point anchor. Furthermore, white's board rates to collapse if things go wrong during my bearoff.

I chose to cube at this point because for every roll where I do not safely bring down my midpoint, I have less and less reason to double. If I get a good double roll like 22, 44, 55, 66, or a 65/56, I missed my chance to double.

I rate to win this match, and I want to throw the cube. I'm willing to wait but I just don't see a better opportunity to double than right now.

Can someone help me understand what I am missing?
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote
11-08-2014 , 01:35 AM
Did you look at the pipcount?
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote
11-08-2014 , 10:25 AM
Right now you're only ahead by 5 pips in the race (115 to 120) so you don't yet have a money double. For money, you'd need to be ahead 11-13 pips for an initial double.

You didn't tell us the match score, but you seemed to imply you're ahead right now. In that case, you'd need a slightly bigger lead to double than for money. So clear no double on your part, and easy take.
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote
11-08-2014 , 11:42 PM
According to the picture above, it's the 1st game of a 5-pt match.
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote
11-09-2014 , 06:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uberkuber
According to the picture above, it's the 1st game of a 5-pt match.
...then the race lead should be even bigger because tp is with around 20% very low.
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote
12-03-2014 , 09:32 PM

This is close to a bloody (cash game) "beaver", and against a weak player I would Beaver this premature initial cube cranking !

The race leader needs to simply clear his outfield so as to do away with the gap, and then "claim" presuming he has the race well in hand.
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote
12-04-2014 , 10:48 AM
Black doesn't need to clear his midpoint to double, he just needs to have a significant race lead.
Having trouble understanding the rationaile behind this cube decision rollout by GNU Quote

      
m