I play 2/0 (2). Locking in on the backgammon. Even if you get hit and closed out, you would need a lot of bad things to happen to lose the game. A lot.
Stacking the 1 is basically a guaranteed gammon (he needs 3 sufficiently large doubles or to roll 11 and then hit you) and +16. If you rip 2, it breaks down as:
Worst case hit/cover you win a single 92% (ok you get cubed occasionally, but you also enter immediately which should more than balance)
So lower bound of (24*19 + 16*3 + 8*14*.92 - 8*14*.08)/36= 16.61
Looks like you rip 2.
Edit: ****, you backgammon on doubles if you stack the 1, so that needs to be 16*5/6 + 24*1/6 = +17.33 which means you have to calculate all the crap for when you get hit and he doesn't cover. It has to be close.
Let E(...) stand for expected winnings, and P(...) stand for probability. To simplify things, we assume the cube is at 1. All E( ) values can be multiplied by 8 later.
If we assume that Blue wins neither a gammon nor backgammon after being hit, we have:
E( rip 2 ) = 3*P( White misses and leaves checker in rear quadrant )
+ 2*P( White runs to outer board with 44 55 or 66 )
+ P( White hits )(92% - 8%)
The figure 8% comes from Stick’s chart of winning percentages against an opponent with N checkers off, and 1 checker closed out.
For the next calculation, assume that rolling a set wins the backgammon, but otherwise White loses a gammon.
E( 3 checkers on 1pt ) = 2 * P( White rolls 33 44 55 66 ) + P( White does not roll 33 44 55 66 ) * (3 * 1/6 + 2 * 5/6)
E( 3 checkers on 1pt ) = 2 * (4/36) + (32/36) * (3 * 1/6 + 2 * 5/6)
E( rip 2 ) = 2.08
E( safe ) = 2.15
Mulitply these values by 8, to get the expected winnings when the cube is at 8.
By these calculations, Blue should play 3 checkers down to the 1pt. But these are close enough that my assumptions are probably invalid. In addition to the ones stated above, you can see in my arithmetic that I have also assumed that White can always complete the closeout after hitting. Perhaps Blue wins more than 92% after being hit. As well, some of those victories may be gammons.