Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
No, direct interference would be God stopping something. Me wanting to do X and God hindering me from doing X. God influencing an angel to influence me but me still being able not do X, would not be directly influencing me. Or God even influencing me to not do X while maintaining my ability to do X would not be directly interfering.
This is complete nonsense. You are hanging your hat on a word, "direct," which you have ensured does absolutely zero work. Its like saying "I didnt DIRECTLY attack the man, I used a bat."
The reason that "direct" and "indirect" have meaning when referring to human beings is because we have imperfect information. There isnt really a dividing line between the two, its just that as we get closer to direct we get closer to certainty about the outcome. When I directly punch you in the face, I can be pretty sure you are getting punched. When I incite a bar brawl, and you "indirectly" get hit in the face by some drunk, I couldnt be sure you'd actually get hit.
If I have intent and perfect knowledge, then every atom in the universe is merely a tool.
Your point is even more ridiculous when there are documented, historical examples of clear-cut, direct tampering, sometimes referred to as "heart-hardening."