So your argument doesn't refer to "God".
It refers to Man's perception of God and his method of describing what would (in my opinion inevitably) be inexpressible.
Yet, still attempting it using the language of religion.

The examples you give (of course there are hundreds) are of concern only for dogmatic apologetics.

If there would be scientific evidence for a God(s) it would certainly imply that it won't be the God of the Abrahamic religions. Just to give an example.

What if the Ark of the Covenant was found, and bizarre phenomena surrounded it? Would that be sufficient evidence?

This seems like a tautology - "If we found the ark of the covenant, then we would know God exists, because we have found the ark of the covenant." In truth, we would never be able to know that it's the genuine ark, even if one did exist.

This is like finding chariots at the bottom of the Red Sea. It doesn't prove anything for those who don't believe. For starers, the Biblical story may have been a representation of an event that led chariots to be under the sea in the first place.

This isn't the evidence that atheists are speaking about. The problem that I see, is that given the strict epistemic norms of a lot of people, they would necessarily reject a revelation from God, since such evidence is "non scientific".

There is no evidence of God.

That's not an answer to the question though.

This is an excellent point. There is such a problem when we talk about "God" because nobody seems to have a shared understanding of who or what "God" is. Even those who espouse a "biblical" view seem to be confused. I think New Testament writers had a very different view of God than that portrayed in the OT. In fact, two substantive claims of the essence of God are made in the NT. One is that God is "spirit"-- that is, not an old bearded man sitting on a cloud throwing lightning down on earth... and the other is that God is "love"-- essentially relational. So I ask is there such a thing as a "spiritual" realm? And, does "love" exist? If so, can it be proven scientifically?

no

Water into wine would probably do it for me.

This is hilarious. Yeah, nothing good came of asking questions or seeking evidence.

And you can exchange 'receptive' for either weak minded, gullible or children.

Let's say I grew up believing the moon was made of cheese..

If I only ever speak to people who believe the moon is made of cheese, read books about the moon being made of cheese and ignore any studies, research, science, evidence that suggests anything other than the moon is made of cheese, I will continue believing in a cheesy moon.