Quote:
Originally Posted by VeeDDzz`
Not all of us are asking for evidence. Some will settle for a falsifiable theory at the least.
What if God appeared to you in your room and encouraged you to believe in him? Would you completely reject this because you can't falsify it?
By only accepting empirical data that you are able to test as proof of God, you are basically rejecting the possibility of God, where God is a supernatural being.
By the same token, God could never communicate with you supernaturally because you would reject it as being supernatural and non-testable.
It seems that in the event that these things happen, the more logical thing to do would be to not simply dismiss them as evidence because it is supernatural, but to examine your beliefs about these things more closely.
What I think your conclusion (and those who insist on data) leads to is that there is no testable proof of God in the natural, not that there is no God.