It makes sense to me get my cavities filled and get the novocaine. It makes no sense not to. It also makes sense to me to care about others pain since i know the feeling of pain and how its not enjoyable.

okay. It makes sense if people give me money since it would make my life better.

They give that away at these things called jobs i think. But money is meaningless so not sure how it could be better or worse to have more or less of it.

of course! oh they actually don't give it away at jobs. You exchange your services, time and skill for money. I have two jobs. Go me. To give something away, in my mind, is to give something freely for nothing.

Yeah the job was a joke. Im more interested in why you put meaningless values of better and worse on money but not cancer.

Its meaningless in a lot of ways. I can speak and ask people for money like begging and they don't have to do anything. My words then are meaningless since they didn't have an impact and often get ignored. I understand that people are under no obligation to help me or listen to me or even pay me any attention. There is no motivation between us to be anything other than strangers. So from other peoples perspective I am meaningless to them (because what connection are they to me and vice versa) From my point of view also is that I am meaningless.

I can literally do anything and it has very little to zero effect on my external reality. I have very little power or influence over my external environment and therefore my actions are meaningless.

That did not answer me. You put values of better and worse on money but not cancer.

If we had an active mod, Batair should be titled "resident Socrates".

And deservedly so.

Because I can do whatever I want. I don't see why you are having a hard time about this.

Idk.. i dont want to have to live up to that.

Ah. Then your BS about not having choices was a cop out. Im just going to take it you are messing around and dont want discussion.

A discussion about what exactly?

Your words.

I've the best words.

Trump reference not trolling.

And some people think religions cause violence or that Muslims are more violent:

“They are like animals. A woman had her hair pulled, an elderly lady took a box on her head, another had a bloody hand. It was horrible,” one customer at the Rive-de-Gier supermarket in central France told Le Progres newspaper

"The Local reported that police were called in Ostricourt in northern France, where a fight had broken out."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ounted-nutella

Muslims are 100000 times more violent then Christans! Any rational person can realize this, just by reading the 2 holly books.

How do you even relate a sandal wearing hippy to an armored warlord on a horse???

Some Christians think Jesus is supposed to come back to earth for the war of Armageddon which will kill all non believers, on a horse.

I think a rational man would have looked at the evidence before making claims.

The story of Muhammed isn't in the Quran, it is in the Hadith .

Now I'm sure you'll have some festive way of making that a moot point, but it's still fun to see you talk about what people who read the book will do, and then revealing yourself to be completely ignorant on what it is about.

Some NLH players think that is ok to have a static minimal defence friquency BBvsBU, independent of the rake...

But to be honest, you can't really argue with me.
Islam is popularized by the sword, Chirstianity and Judaism by the spoken word.

LOL noob kid. I have studied theology for the past 5 years.

I get your delusional point:

"Communism is OK, because none of the great marxist Villians of our century was really a Marxist"

People like u are sick in the head.

I am not saying that Muslism are all evil. Not all Facist were evil, not all communists were evil. But in general you can clearlly see the evidence...

My contry was 500 years under Muslim slavery. 500 years you rational man.
Please explain to me how I know less then you, about muslism?

Stick to the point please, none of this has any bearing on the error you committed.

But I'm impressed. You studied theology for five years, then come in here and write a post giving the impression that the Quran contains the story of Muhammad? Which it doesn't. To make matters worse you explicitly stated that rational people must think X after reading the books, which is a pretty damning statement when you clearly don't know at least one of them at all.

You can stop the proselytizing, I'm not interested in your conclusions yet, I'm interested in your errors.

This part of 2+2 is really sad, USA has some big issues to adress.

OK we have so set the frame first. So may I ask:

1. Where did I speak about Mohammad being or not being in the Quran.
2. Do you think that the Quran is the final legit text of the muslim religion?
3. Do you claim that the story of Mohammed not being in the Quran is making the evidence we have less true or valid.

Why don't adress the real facts.
1. Killing people for being gay.
2. Beating woman and not giving them human rights.
3. Killing Christians or making them pay tax for protection.
4. The Quran describes 2 houses of Islam.
a) the house of War ( all non-muslims )
b) the house of Islam.

if you think u can make a solid case using politcal ideology you are mistaken the person.

No, the sad thing here is that you come in here and write a factual error and lie about studying a book you don't know.

Any discussion on the violence or non-violence of Muslims is irrelevant, the point here is that you haven't done what you implied everyone else should do to form an opinion.

That's called intellectual dishonesty, and I find it amusing that your only answer seems to be some paranoid diatribe against imaginary foes and "you people" while lamenting American problems.

Because I sincerely doubt the solution any problems in this world lies in refusing to address factual mistakes.

Do you claim that Mohammad is not the prophet of all muslims?
I bet not!
Kid you are delusional dont ruin this forum, you are too brainwashed to talk sense...

And to adress my point about USA.

Double Thinking is a standard on your news.
Maybe a bad example but here we go:

1. The antartic ice sheet is not losing but gaining ice.
Alarmist and even Nasa ( who prove my case of the ice sheets gaining volume ) claim that the Ice Sheets are melting. Clear case of double thinking and anti-scientific way of thinking.
2. The polar bears population is increasing, but your news claim that is decreasing.
3. The best climate model can predict 5 days ahead at best. How do u justify predicting 10-20-30 years ahead?
A computer model is good only if you observe the results in real life,
none of what the IPCC models has even close to valid predictions.
4. Alarmist and news anchors claim that the increase in sea level will damage corals... ask any marine biologist and he will laught at you. More water.

How is that not a symptom of something terrible???

I haven't said anyhing about what Muhammed is or is not, which is also irrelevant here. I've merely noted that you've implicitly argued that his story is in the Quran, which it is not, while you simultaneously held that rational people should form an opinion after reading the book.

That you're response to this is merely to try and push the debate to where you want it to go is as expected as it is dreary.

You see, I'm only interested in here is your mistake - and I'm only interested in it because it was so hypocritical. Because I enjoy exposing intellectual shams.

If you want to go and peddle your opinions without caring about errors you make, try facebook or twitter. Or make a blog.