Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyDiamonds
That's a well thought-out post. Very good.
I assume you are referring to the 'reporter' here.
I'm talking about this forum in general.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyDiamonds
Ya see Rize.... you are a pretty smart cookie. But at times...you tend to choose to attack believers rather than presenting your side and choice to not believe.
Sure I will do that at times. But when you have lost causes like Splendour and Pletho floating around here, there's really nothing else to do with them. Any logical or scientific point you make to them is completely lost. I think Stu and Jib will at the very least read your argument and consider most of the time, although they both have their Plethoesque moments where they just refuse to honestly answer things.
I honestly just cannot handle when people's biases and hopes cloud their ability to objectively evaluate things. I have no tolerance for that whatsoever, you're right. And that's probably why there are so many atheists on this forum. Poker demands that you evaluate a situation objectively. If you played poker thinking only things like "Well, I'd really like my opponent to have air here. I call." You get torn apart. A person that thinks "
What reasons do I have to think my opponent has air here?" is in a much better position to play well.
Religion is not much different than this for me. Religious people are essentially looking at our situation and before they evaluate anything, they are already thinking "I'd really like there to be a god." And then they attempt to fit any information they find in the world into that hope. An atheist simply asks, with no preconceived notions or hopes "What reason do we have to believe that god exists?" And the answer, by all objective accounts, is very little.
This is a microcosm of why being a good poker player generally also makes that person a non-believer.