Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour

02-09-2009 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tame_deuces
A friend of mine is converting to islam.
Tsk, tsk. What kind of friend are you?

I managed to make a Muslim friend and colleague into an apostate. That's how you're supposed to do it.

(Kidding aside, though, true story. He even gave me his Arabic luxury edition of the Qur'an for my Birthday -- as a symbolic gift, saying it was of no use for him any more. It was originally a gift from his parents when he left his home country.)
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-10-2009 , 02:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carded
Ah yes, whippings, prison, death, torture, denial of personal wealth, and Crucifiction = PROFIT!!

Jesus was just a really sharp entrepreneur.
Jesus is obviously not the creator of Christianity.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-10-2009 , 06:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aytumious
Jesus is obviously not the creator of Christianity.
same thing happened to Peter the founder of the christain churches..
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-10-2009 , 07:31 AM
Fine. But you misinterpreted my point. Which is if the Torah makes great demands on you, it would stand to reason that someone would come up with a religion where "belief" was the main demand instead. I probably shouldn't have used the word entrepreneur.

I should probably mention that if there is a heaven, I agree with Not Ready that the percentage of humans who deserve it is a small one digit number. We differ perhaps by two.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-10-2009 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundGuy
Not quite. They will be judged by Old Testament Jewish law. The Torah.

Who can pass that freaking test.....
I'm actually pretty sure this is not true, or at least, it's not universally held. For instance the ten commandments - only seven (I think) of these are held to apply to all humanity - the ones that aren't about Yahweh. Because the Hebrews are god's 'chosen people', they get extra rules. I think the points of law that apply to Gentiles are the 'Elohim' (sp?) - or maybe that refers to the people who obey the laws. What I mean is, Mosaic law specifically says Gentiles are OK to eat stuff that Hebrews aren't - or at least, that Hebrews are OK to give/sell such food to Gentiles.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-19-2009 , 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
Wrong. The original Christians did see Jesus as God. It was not until the 2nd and 3rd century when the gnostics came along that anyone thought he was not God. And they were still a minority, it has NEVER been the dominate view.
David Sorry for derailing your thread!

Jibninjas, Show the facts please that the origianal Christians believed Jesus Christ was God. I think you have your facts mixed up. It is actaully the other way around. And started to be highly propounded by one Constantine, who was the ground layer for the Catholic Church. If you didn't agree with this Emperor he would chop your head off. So he through political and tyranical influence instituded and propounded the false Christian Doctrine of the trinity. Which NOW because of the Catholic Church is the supposed cornerstone of Christianity.

All the protestant denominations that broke off from Catholism during the reformation shed alot of the Catholic beliefs and went back to actually reading the bible instead of listening only to the Pope for spiritual guidence.

Unfortunatley they did not shed all of Catholisms wrong Doctrine, such as the trinity and that Jesus is God. Neither of these things are mentioned in the bible. Numerous fights and arguemnts will probably stem from this post. But the truth is the truth.

Trinity is not a biblical word nor is it in the bible. Jesus being God is not in the bible. It does however say that Jesus Christ WAS God's son.

Lets be logical about this. Can a the Father God be the Son also? Can a Father be his son also. This is the stuff I have been reffering to in other threads that makes Christianity a mockery. Any logical unbeliever knows that this makes no sense at all. It takes a Christian to come up with some of this stupid stuff.

No wonder the unbelievers have so much fuel and unbelief towards God and Christianity. The majority of mainstream Christianity is beliefs in the Trinity blindly without ever researching or finding out HOW it came into existance.

They believe in something that is not even in the bible.

So for that I understand and side with the unbelievers that Christianity looks stupid at times in light of this Doctrine and many others I wont go into.


Pletho

Last edited by Pletho; 02-19-2009 at 01:15 AM.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 09:40 AM
I missed this post. Bump for Jib.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin A
I missed this post. Bump for Jib.
+1 I would love to read Jib's response to Pletho's post.

If some of the other theists could weigh in, that would be a bonus.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pletho
Unfortunatley they did not shed all of Catholisms wrong Doctrine, such as the trinity and that Jesus is God. Neither of these things are mentioned in the bible. Numerous fights and arguemnts will probably stem from this post. But the truth is the truth.

Trinity is not a biblical word nor is it in the bible. Jesus being God is not in the bible. It does however say that Jesus Christ WAS God's son.
Ok now my curiousity is peaked.

The Athanasian Creed, the longest and most philosophical of the ancient ecumenical creeds, enunciates the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity in the following manner:

That we worship one God in trinity and the trinity in unity, neither blending their persons nor dividing their essence. For the person of the Father is a distinct person, the person of the Son is another, and that of the Holy Spirit still another. But the divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty coeternal….

Thus the Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit is God. Yet there are not three gods; there is but one God.

Thus the Father is Lord, the Son is Lord, the Holy Spirit is Lord. Yet there are not three lords; there is but one Lord.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pletho
Lets be logical about this. Can a the Father God be the Son also? Can a Father be his son also. This is the stuff I have been reffering to in other threads that makes Christianity a mockery. Any logical unbeliever knows that this makes no sense at all. It takes a Christian to come up with some of this stupid stuff.

They believe in something that is not even in the bible.

Pletho
I agree that Jesus never said the words, "I am God", but refrences were definitely made of equality such as,

To know Jesus is to know Yahweh: "If you knew me, you would know my Father also" (John 14:7).

To see Jesus is to see Yahweh: "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father" (John 14:9).

To encounter Jesus is to encounter Yahweh: "Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me" (John 14:11).

To trust in Jesus is to trust in Yahweh: "Trust in God, trust also in me" (John 14:1).

and in Genesis 1:26 God said, "Let us make a man..." Before anyone was ever made God was speaking to what I've always known to be the trinity.

Last edited by BigErf; 02-20-2009 at 11:43 AM.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 12:07 PM
Pletho, also isn't the "trinity" what makes Christianity so special, because this is what allows mankind to know God? Jesus and the Holy Spirit is how God revealed Himself to the world so that man can have a personal relationship with The Father.

Without the trinity there is no distinction between Yahweh and say, Allah, because then God is monotheism. Islam can't claim to have a personal relationship with Allah because Allah is never revealed in a personal way or to an individuals spirit within, whereas Jesus and the Holy Spirit are (I thought) equal representations of God The Father.

I am eagerly awaiting your response to this and don't mind if you write a four page response

Because now that you have mentioned it I do not recall "trinity" in the Bible, although I don't think it necessarily hurts Christianity for us to label it as that for representation purposes. And the fact that you say Jesus was NOT God really has me wanting to hear your response. Because as you know I DO respect your interpretation and translation of the Bible so for you to say this has me on the edge of my seat, LITERALLY!
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 01:51 PM
Thanks for the bump Justin, I did not see this before.

Pletho,

I feel that you and I might be talking about two different things. The doctrine of the trinity most certainly did exist before Augustine. The term was coined by Tertullian in about 200AD. Although the word trinity did not exist, it was most certainly believed by both the apostles as well as the apostolic fathers and the early church. You are correct that Augustine redefined what the trinity was from what the early Christians believed, but he did not invent the notion. But what Tertullian and others believed and what the Roman Catholic Church and Augustine believed about the trinity were most definitely different notions. So I agree the Augustinian belief in the trinity holds very little water in the bible as well as was not believed by the early church. But the notion of the trinity did exist and does hold a biblical basis in the form of Tertullian trinity.

Jesus often made reference to a oneness between him and God,

Quote:
John 10:29-30 29My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all[d]; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand. 30I and the Father are one."

John 14:7 7If you really knew me, you would know[a] my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."

John 14:9-11 9Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'? 10Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you are not just my own. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles themselves.
The Apostles also consistently refer to Jesus a Lord and set him up to the same degree as God.

Quote:
1 Cor 12:3 3Therefore I tell you that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, "Jesus be cursed," and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except by the Holy Spirit.

1 Cor 8:6 6yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live.

Col 1:15-20 15He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. 17He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.

Hebrews 1:1-3 1In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe. 3The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.

John 1:1-3 1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning. 3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

Rom. 9:5 5Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised![a] Amen.

Hebrews 1:8-12 8But about the Son he says,
"Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy."[a] 10He also says,
"In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end."

Titus 2:13 13while we wait for the blessed hope—the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

1 John 5:20 20We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true—even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.

Also the NT shows ascribes the same thing to the Holy Spirit.

Acts 5:3-4 3Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? 4Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God."

Matt 12:28;32 28But if I drive out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. 32Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
On the same note the Holy Spirit is seen as a separate entity from God.

Quote:
Matt 28:19 19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[a] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

Luke 11:13 3If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!"

John 14:26 26But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.

John 15:26 26"When the Counselor comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father, he will testify about me.

Romans 8:26-27 26In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express. 27And he who searches our hearts knows the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints in accordance with God's will.
So even though you see that the NT ascribes the title of God and characteristics of God to both Jesus and the Holy Spirit, it also clearly shows that they are in themselves a separate entity.

So to say that there is no biblical basis for the notion of the trinity is not correct. Now I am not saying that Augustinian trinity existed but that a different form of the trinity as laid out by Tertullian did exist in the NT.

Now we will take a quick look at how Tertullian and others describe the trinity as laid out by the early church. (early Church referring to around 200AD and before). All of this can be found here http://www.bible.ca/H-trinity.htm

Quote:
• 150 AD Justin Martyr "The Father of the universe has a Son, who also being the first begotten Word of God, is even God." (Justin Martyr, First Apology, ch 63)

150 AD Justin Martyr "Therefore these words testify explicitly that He [Christ] is witnessed to by Him who established these things, as deserving to be worshipped, as God and as Christ." - Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 63.



• 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria [note: Clement NEVER calls Jesus a creature.] "There was then, a Word importing an unbeginning eternity; as also the Word itself, that is, the Son of God, who being, by equality of substance, one with the Father, is eternal and uncreated." (Fragments, Part I, section III) "that so great a work was accomplished in so brief a space by the Lord, who, though despised as to appearance, was in reality adored, the expiator of sin, the Saviour, the clement, the Divine Word, He that is truly most manifest Deity, He that is made equal to the Lord of the universe; because He was His Son, and the Word was in God, not disbelieved in by all when He was first preached, nor altogether unknown when, assuming the character of man, and fashioning Himself in flesh, He enacted the drama of human salvation: for He was a true champion and a fellow-champion with [ie. God among creatures, not that Jesus is classed as a creature] the creature." (Exhortations, Chap 10)

• 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "I understand nothing else than the Holy Trinity to be meant; for the third is the Holy Spirit, and the Son is the second, by whom all things were made according to the will of the Father." (Stromata, Book V, ch. 14)

• 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "When [John] says: 'What was from the beginning [1 John 1:1],' he touches upon the generation without beginning of the Son, who is co-equal with the Father. 'Was,' therefore, is indicative of an eternity without a beginning, just as the Word Himself, that is the Son, being one with the Father in regard to equality of substance, is eternal and uncreated. That the word always existed is signified by the saying: 'In the beginning was the Word' [John 1:1]." (fragment in Eusebius History, Bk 6 Ch 14; Jurgens, p. 188)

• 200 AD Tertullian "All the Scriptures give clear proof of the Trinity, and it is from these that our principle is deduced...the distinction of the Trinity is quite clearly displayed." (Against Praxeas, ch 11)

• 200 AD Tertullian "The origins of both his substances display him as man and as God: from the one, born, and from the other, not born" (The Flesh of Christ, 5:6-7).

• 200 AD Tertullian "[God speaks in the plural ‘Let us make man in our image’] because already there was attached to Him his Son, a second person, his own Word, and a third, the Spirit in the Word....one substance in three coherent persons. He was at once the Father, the Son, and the Spirit." (Against Praxeas, ch 12)

• 200 AD Tertullian "Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent Persons, who are yet distinct One from Another. These Three are, one essence, not one Person, as it is said, 'I and my Father are One' [John 10:30], in respect of unity of Being not singularity of number" (Against Praxeas, 25)

• 200 AD Tertullian "As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons — the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian)

200 AD Tertullian "[W]hen God says, 'Let there be light' [Gen. 1:3], this is the perfect nativity of the Word, while he is proceeding from God. . . . Thus, the Father makes him equal to himself, and the Son, by proceeding from him, was made the first-begotten, since he was begotten before all things, and the only-begotten, because he alone was begotten of God, in a manner peculiar to himself, from the womb of his own heart, to which even the Father himself gives witness: 'My heart has poured forth my finest Word' [Ps. 45:1Against Praxeas 7:1).
So you see from all of these quotes and many more like it that the idea of the trinity, although not always called the trinity, most certainly did exist in both the NT and in the teachings of the early Church.

Now again, I will agree that the doctrine of the trinity as laid out by Augustine and the Roman Catholic church was not an early church teaching nor is it very biblical. But you must differentiate between what the Roman Catholic church holds as true, and what is actually in the bible.

So I stand firm on my previous statement that the notion or idea of the trinity most assuredly is a biblical doctrine and was held by the early Church.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 02:25 PM
I have a question about the differences in the Augustine and Tertullian doctrines of the trinity. This goes way past my depth of understanding as I haven't even begun to explore these areas. My question is what exactly was the difference? To me it would appear that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is pretty clear-cut and needs no distinction. It either exists or it doesn't. And Jib, if you say that, "Augustine redefined what the trinity was from what the early Christians believed", what exactly was redefined?
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigErf
I have a question about the differences in the Augustine and Tertullian doctrines of the trinity. This goes way past my depth of understanding as I haven't even begun to explore these areas. My question is what exactly was the difference? To me it would appear that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is pretty clear-cut and needs no distinction. It either exists or it doesn't. And Jib, if you say that, "Augustine redefined what the trinity was from what the early Christians believed", what exactly was redefined?
Augustinian trinity refers more to the notion that the father, son, and holy spirit are 1 person and that there is no real separation between them. Kinda like how as people we are made up of mind, body, and spirit. So my spirit is not actually a different person from me, but more so a different characteristic of me. Does that make sense?

Tertullian described the relationship between God the father and Jesus as God being the sun and Jesus being the rays of sun. So even though they are distinct they still hold the same "God property"
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 02:55 PM
A trillion brain cells that just might have found a cure for cancer. Bet Jesus would have agreed with me.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
A trillion brain cells that just might have found a cure for cancer. Bet Jesus would have agreed with me.
^^ What is DS referring to? Does anyone know?
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
Augustinian trinity refers more to the notion that the father, son, and holy spirit are 1 person and that there is no real separation between them. Kinda like how as people we are made up of mind, body, and spirit. So my spirit is not actually a different person from me, but more so a different characteristic of me. Does that make sense?
Okay I see where the confusion comes in between the two and yes, I agree that the Bible portrays the trinity to be that of the Tertullian description.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splendour
^^ What is DS referring to? Does anyone know?
Haha I was just wondering the same thing
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splendour
^^ What is DS referring to? Does anyone know?
Maybe that all the work and brain power spent from Pletho's comment to Jib's response could have been spent on something more useful????

Shame on you DS! We're learning here..
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-20-2009 , 06:56 PM
Yeah, that's what I meant. And I believe Jews agree with me. Including the one I mentioned by name.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote
02-21-2009 , 04:17 PM
Pletho what group do you belong to that doesn't believe in a Trinity?

The word trinity isn't used in the bible but a lot of biblical doctrines like: adoption, sanctification, communion, etc. weren't named until later as people tried to quantify and understand biblical ideas and expound on them.

See Jesus as God in the wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity

I came across Revelation 1:8 and 1:18 last night and it seems to refute the idea that Jesus wasn't God.

Revelation 1:8 (Contemporary English Version)
8The Lord God says, "I am Alpha and Omega, [c] the one who is and was and is coming. I am God All-Powerful!"

-or-

Revelation 1:18 (New International Reader's Version)
18 I am the Living One. I was dead. But look! I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys to Death and Hell.

Last edited by Splendour; 02-21-2009 at 04:21 PM. Reason: number typo corrected.
Which Theists Agree With These Words By Splendour Quote

      
m