Was that last post (of Greatest I am, who's odd quoting style makes it too hard to quote back, especially when I'm running another program in the background that won't let me copy/paste stuff) serious? I was replying to your post and copied the style of your sentence to prove that it didn't make sense. Instead of responding to that, you go off about something else. Let's try again, but slower.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatest I am
Strange how you can definitively know His desires without knowing why.
See, you say that it's strange to be able to know God's desires without knowing why. As an analogy, I mentioned that I knew some of your desires without knowing why and asked if that was strange too. Does this make sense now? Can I bring the analogy back out, or will you still not see where I am going with this?
Next, you mention that authority has rules that it follows too. But you ignore that these are not the same rules as the subjects of that authority follow. So since you didn't comment on the actual issue and it's clearly true, I'll assume that you agree with it. Therefore, how is it wrong for God to have different rules to follow than His people when you are ok for governments to have different rules to follow than its people?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatest I am
If your God is so quick to break His word to man of giving us dominion then He is an immoral SOB.
He is said to be immortal yet sure is in a hurRgeardsry.
God did not break His word. You can't just claim it and expect for it to come true. We've been over this in this very thread multiple times. I've had to walk you through the entire process because you refused to actually post your ideas instead of insults. And in the last post on the subject, I showed you how there's a difference between your will (what you choose) and your free will (how you choose it). Your response was simply an attempt to try to prove free will, which is irrelevant to the discussion at hand even if the proof would have been valid.
So again, you really ignored the issue, leading me to have to believe you no longer have any disagreements with it? Or at the least, you should by now understand that there is a logical and acceptable viewpoint wherein God does not take away one's free will by killing him. And therefore you don't have to assume that God is going back on His word of giving us free will unless you're just out to make God look evil because of your not-so-secret agenda.
Did you pass out on your keyboard at the end there? I don't even know how that's relevant.